2003
DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200312000-00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of Clinical Significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
257
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
257
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlations between the DD-CGAS and other measures of functioning and symptoms were moderate (Cohen, 1988;Kraemer, 2005), within the range one would expect when instruments measure different but related constructs. Correlations with measures of adaptive skills and IQ suggested about 25% shared variance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Correlations between the DD-CGAS and other measures of functioning and symptoms were moderate (Cohen, 1988;Kraemer, 2005), within the range one would expect when instruments measure different but related constructs. Correlations with measures of adaptive skills and IQ suggested about 25% shared variance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The descriptive statistics for the baseline and post STR measurements including the "adjusted" outcome mean (controlling for the covariate) for the intervention and control groups are presented in Table 1. (Kraemer et al 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NNT was employed because it takes into account the base rates of each condition of interest. 27 NNT was originally developed to help assess the efficacy of one treatment compared with another; however, in the current study NNT seeks to answer the question, ''How many participants from one group do you have to see to find one more ''failure'' (e.g., one more participant who [binges]) than if you had sampled participants from the comparison group?'' 28 An NNT greater than nine is considered a weak effect, between 4 and 9 a moderate effect, and less than four a strong effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%