2021
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of emotion regulation: Convergence and psychometric properties of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale and emotion regulation questionnaire

Abstract: Objective Investigating unique and shared aspects of measures of emotion regulation (ER) advances our understanding of ER as a multidimensional construct. This study aimed to investigate psychometric properties of three ER‐measures: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS‐36), the abbreviated version DERS‐16, and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). Methods In a community sample (N = 843; 56% females) we investigated their internal consistency, factor structure, convergence, and association with symp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The DERS is a widely used tool that demonstrates good psychometric properties in different settings and cultures. 40 , 41 In the present study, Cronbach’s α was 0.93.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 45%
“…The DERS is a widely used tool that demonstrates good psychometric properties in different settings and cultures. 40 , 41 In the present study, Cronbach’s α was 0.93.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 45%
“…ER has been more narrowly operationalized in two different ways in research: as a person's general (in)ability to recognize emotions and resist maladaptive emotion‐driven impulses (i.e., broad ER difficulties), or as use of specific strategies that are typically more or less adaptive to manage emotions (i.e., ER strategy use) (Tull & Aldao, 2015). While broad ER difficulties and use of specific ER strategies are conceptually related, correlations between them are small‐to‐moderate (e.g., r s = .12–.36; Sörman et al, 2021; Westerlund & Santtila, 2018), suggesting they are distinct. Both broad ER difficulties and greater use of maladaptive ER strategies (e.g., rumination, self‐criticism) are consistently associated with BE and EE in between‐person studies (i.e., studies that compare individuals who differ in ER on average; Aldao et al, 2010; Brockmeyer et al, 2014; Kenny et al, 2017; Prefit et al, 2019; Whiteside et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores ranged from 4 to 28, with higher scores representing higher habitual use of suppression. The ERQ-SUP has been validated and shown to have criterion validity [ 24 ] and internal consistency (α=.76-.96) [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%