1983
DOI: 10.5465/256134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of Perrow's Work Unit Technology: An Empirical Assessment and a New Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
150
0
5

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
150
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…If they do not know how to respond, the event can be viewed as novel. The Analyzability subscale from Withey, Daft, and Cooper (1983) was used because when events are not analyzable, no rules or procedures can tell a team member how to respond. In essence, team members will have to actively search beyond the existing procedures for a response (Withey et al, 1983).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If they do not know how to respond, the event can be viewed as novel. The Analyzability subscale from Withey, Daft, and Cooper (1983) was used because when events are not analyzable, no rules or procedures can tell a team member how to respond. In essence, team members will have to actively search beyond the existing procedures for a response (Withey et al, 1983).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Analyzability subscale from Withey, Daft, and Cooper (1983) was used because when events are not analyzable, no rules or procedures can tell a team member how to respond. In essence, team members will have to actively search beyond the existing procedures for a response (Withey et al, 1983). For each event, external team leaders were asked, "Considering each of the events listed on the attached form, please indicate the extent to which the event influenced the team on the following response scale."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine tasks are invariable, repetitious, and handle lower frequencies of unexpected and novel events (Hage & Aiken, 1969;Perrow, 1967;Withey, Daft, & Cooper, 1983). Employees that execute routine tasks only deal with a few exceptions and a narrow range of problems (Perrow, 1967;Volberda, 1996).…”
Section: Hypothesis 4b Formalization Will Be Positively Related To Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure formalization, we used a five-item formalization scale ( = .73) from Desphandé and Zaltman (1982). Routinization tapped into the extent to which tasks within units were invariable, uniform or predictable (Whitney, Daft, & Cooper, 1983). Based on Perrow's (1967) work on unit technology, routinization ( = .73) was measured by the exceptions scale of Whitney, Daft, and Cooper (1983).…”
Section: Measurement and Validation Of Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure of routinization was adapted from Withey, Daft and Cooper (1983) and includes: "My job has lots of variety" (R), "My duties are repetitious in my job," and "I have the opportunity to do a number of different things in my job" (R). Work overload was measured by five Likert items.…”
Section: Bureaucratic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%