Financial Planning and Counseling Scales 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6908-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cronbach's (1951) for the recoded score was .78. This compared favorably with an a = .80 for the scale reported in Grable et al (2011) for the four-point scale.…”
Section: Scale Reliabilitiessupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cronbach's (1951) for the recoded score was .78. This compared favorably with an a = .80 for the scale reported in Grable et al (2011) for the four-point scale.…”
Section: Scale Reliabilitiessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Therefore, willingness to take financial risks may be one of the factors that affect a person’s decision to move from savings vehicles to investing vehicles. The original scale had an α = .80 (Grable, Archuleta, & Nazarinia, 2011). In this study, Financial Risk Tolerance was measured using the five‐item Financial Risk‐Tolerance Scale by Grable and Joo (2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%