2019
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures to Avoid Coercion in Psychiatry and Their Efficacy

Abstract: Der Bundesverband der Psychiatrie-Erfahrenen (BPE) hat der Endfassung der Leitlinie nicht zugestimmt.Honorare für Vortrags-und Schulungstätigkeiten oder bezahlte Autoren-oder Koautorenschaften im Auftrag pharmazeutischer, biotechnologischer, medizintechnischer Unternehmen Finanzielle Zuwendungen (Drittmittel) für Forschungsvorhaben, direkte Finanzierung von Mitarbeitenden der Einrichtung von Seiten kommerziell orientierter (pharmazeutischer, biotechnologischer bzw. medizintechnischer Unternehmen bzw. Auftragsi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 261 publications
(210 reference statements)
1
70
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study broadly agree with the scientific literature, which emphasize that a combination of interventions to minimize the use of CM is necessary both individually and in terms of the involved organization, as well as the adoption of complex highly evidenced models [17,21,22,24,27,32,36,41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The findings of this study broadly agree with the scientific literature, which emphasize that a combination of interventions to minimize the use of CM is necessary both individually and in terms of the involved organization, as well as the adoption of complex highly evidenced models [17,21,22,24,27,32,36,41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Reducing the use of coercive interventions in in-patient psychiatry has been a major issue of interest in many countries. A considerable range of interventions has proven some efficacy in controlled studies [1]. However, evidence is still inconsistent also for highly favoured interventions such as de-escalation training and joint crisis plans [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalence numbers like these of course don´t say anything about the necessity and adequacy of the coercive measures employed. But as coercive measures constitute a violation of patients’ human rights and are often experienced as such by patients [ 4 , 29 , 43 ], as they can have serious adverse effects ranging from emotional trauma to severe physical injury [ 3 , 4 , 26 , 51 ] and as attitudes towards physical violence, both in society in general and in the institutional context, have changed over time [ 30 ], efforts are made both in research and clinical practice to identify strategies to reduce coercive measures [ 8 , 15 , 18 ] and to make the measures more understandable for patients, e.g. by patient information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%