2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1425247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring a Boom and Bust: The Sydney Housing Market 2001-2006

Abstract: The Sydney housing market peaked in 2003. The period 2001-2006 is, therefore, of particular interest since it captures a boom and bust in the housing market. We compute hedonic, repeat-sales and median price indexes for five regions in Sydney over this period. While the three approaches are in broad agreement regarding the timing of the turning point in the housing market, some important differences also emerge. In particular, we find evidence of sample selection bias in our hedonic and repeat-sales data sets,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, a repeat-sales index may be biased. This seems to be the situation observed by Hill, Melser and Syed (2009) in their data set for Sydney, and by Shimizu, Nishimura and Watanabe (2010) for Tokyo.…”
Section: Constructing House Price and Rent Indexessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In this case, a repeat-sales index may be biased. This seems to be the situation observed by Hill, Melser and Syed (2009) in their data set for Sydney, and by Shimizu, Nishimura and Watanabe (2010) for Tokyo.…”
Section: Constructing House Price and Rent Indexessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Hill et al . () find two such trends in their data set for Sydney, Australia (obtained from Australian Property Monitors). First, the coverage improves over time.…”
Section: Criticisms Of Hedonic Price Indexesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These postcode identifiers can take the form of dummy variables. In the case of the Sydney data set, the inclusion of postcode dummies acts to increase the R ‐squared coefficient from about 0.56 to 0.76 (see Hill et al ., ). The hedonic model now takes the following form: y=Zβ+Bγ+Dδ+ɛ,where the additional term B is an H×(Mx02010;1) matrix of postcode dummy variables, γ is an (Mx02010;1)×1 vector of postcode parameters, and M is the number of postcode identifiers.…”
Section: A Taxonomy Of Hedonic Price Indexes For Housingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations