2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.650883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Abnormal Bond Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
162
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
162
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This method, as Bessembinder et al . () conclude, has the disadvantage of high correlations between bonds issued by the same firm. We therefore cluster standard errors by time and firms when running regressions in the main tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This method, as Bessembinder et al . () conclude, has the disadvantage of high correlations between bonds issued by the same firm. We therefore cluster standard errors by time and firms when running regressions in the main tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Following Bessembinder et al . (), we form corporate bond portfolios based on credit rating and time to maturity. We classify six rating groups – AAA, AA− to AA+, A− to A+, BBB− to BBB+, BB− to BB+, and below B+ – and three time to maturity groups – 0 to 8 years, 9 to 11 years, and 12+ years .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a bond event study context, Bessembinder et al . () argue against employing a randomly selected bond credit spreads, as the dependent variable will be less subject to bond‐specific pricing variability, and we expect this to also hold true in levels‐based tests we employ. We also include equity volatility as a pivotal control variable in our pricing and loss forecasting models, given evidence in Campbell and Taksler () on its importance as a credit risk predictor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We calculate daily average bond yield spreads over the corresponding Treasury rate by weighing each bond transaction by its size (Bessembinder et al. ()). For each bond, we then average the daily yield spreads across the calendar month.…”
Section: Ratings Quality and Secondary Market Bond Spreadsmentioning
confidence: 99%