2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring accessibility using gravity and radiation models

Abstract: Since the presentation of the radiation model, much work has been done to compare its findings with those obtained from gravitational models. These comparisons always aim at measuring the accuracy with which the models reproduce the mobility described by origin–destination matrices. This has been done at different spatial scales using different datasets, and several versions of the models have been proposed to adjust to various spatial systems. However, the models, to our knowledge, have never been compared wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pairwise models suffer from the lack of competition between nodes [30,31]. As such, they tend to work for non-competitive interactions and cannot accurately describe the competitiveness nature of the global air transport industry.…”
Section: Multi-point Entropy Maximization Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pairwise models suffer from the lack of competition between nodes [30,31]. As such, they tend to work for non-competitive interactions and cannot accurately describe the competitiveness nature of the global air transport industry.…”
Section: Multi-point Entropy Maximization Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…based on established studies), then discovering the correct function form and the parameters is costly. Nonetheless, the BLV model has been applied successfully to complex challenges in urban retail, mobility [30], and policing.…”
Section: Future Scope For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the model can be developed further by taking into account the distinguishability of the trips [35][36][37]. Early after the gravity model introduction, the possibility of defining a potential was discussed [38] but the lack of reliable data prevented ulterior research in this direction.Several works have focused on the comparison between the two families of models and their performance when compared with empirical data [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. It is worth mentioning that a fair comparison requires to be carried out over the same type of mobility data (daily or sporadic trips behave differently) and with the same constraints.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population-level mobility models characterize the flow of people between locations using local attributes (e.g., their populations or the distance between the locations). They have been used for many applications, such as modeling commuter flow between locations [5], trade flow between countries [6], and traffic flow inside a city [7]. Although these applications are diverse, they are all on large spatial scales, ranging from inter-country level on a scale of thousands of kilometers (e.g., estimating trade flow [6,8]) to city and region levels at the scale of tens of kilometers (e.g., estimating commuting patterns [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%