Measuring Actual eHealth Literacy Among Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: a Qualitative Analysis of Problems Encountered Using Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 Applications

Abstract

BackgroundThe Internet offers diverse opportunities for disease management, through information websites (Health 1.0) and interactive applications such as peer support forums, online consults, and insight into electronic medical records (Health 2.0). However, various skills are required to benefit from Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 applications for one’s own health, known as eHealth literacy.ObjectiveTo study the eHealth literacy of patients with rheumatic diseases and the types of problems they encounter when using the Internet in relation to their disease.MethodsIn two studies, patients were asked about their current disease-related Internet use and their eHealth literacy was observed during performance tests. In study 1, 15 patients (aged 39-74) performed 6 information-retrieval tasks on the Internet (Health 1.0). In study 2, 16 patients (aged 24-72) performed 3 Health 2.0 tasks on a hospital-based online Web portal and 2 Health 2.0 tasks on interactive websites. Participants were asked to think aloud while performing the assignments, and screen activities were recorded. Types and frequency of problems were identified by 2 independent researchers and coded into categories using inductive analysis.ResultsAlmost all patients in our studies had searched the Internet for information about rheumatic diseases in the past. Fewer patients had used Health 2.0 applications, but many were nevertheless enthusiastic about the possibilities from Health 2.0 applications after finishing the assignments. However, nearly all participants experienced difficulties, and a substantial number of participants were not able to complete all of the assignments. Encountered problems could be divided into 6 sequential categories: (1) operating the computer and Internet browser, (2) navigating and orientating on the Web, (3) utilizing search strategies, (4) evaluating relevance and reliability, (5) adding content to the Web, and (6) protecting and respecting privacy. Most severe difficulties occurred in levels 3 and 4—in formulating a search query, evaluating the source of the information, and in scanning a website for relevant information.ConclusionsMany patients have insufficient skills to properly use Health 1.0 and Health 2.0. Formulating proper search strategies and evaluating the found information caused problems among the majority of patients. Concerning Health 2.0, use and awareness of these applications is low and patients should be guided in the use of them. Our findings may contribute to the awareness of patients’ eHealth literacy problems among health professionals, and stress the importance of usability guidelines in Web design.

Promoting individual health using information technology: Trends in the US health system

“…Patient-centred online health education allows self-directed individuals to choose their pace of learning, relevant content and learning outcomes. The use of online resources can be maximised by optimising website design, interface, reliability of sources and user-friendly and age-appropriate tools (Van der Vaart et al, 2013). However, additional factors to be considered are the computer and health literacy levels of the target audience.…”

“…However, additional factors to be considered are the computer and health literacy levels of the target audience. To date, many eHealth resources and applications remain underutilised, and more research is warranted to develop proper awareness and education strategies that may improve electronic health literacy and user-friendly application designs ( Van der Vaart et al, 2013).…”

Self-reported eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students in South Korea: A pilot study

“…As the Internet provides plenty of health information, patients are required to be eHealth literate in order to have benefits from eHealth information (Van der Varrt et al, 2013). A study, however, recognized that many patients have insufficient skills to use eHealth information and that they especially have difficulties in formulating a search query, evaluating the quality of the information, and scanning a website for relevant information (Van der Varrt et al, 2013).…”

“…A study, however, recognized that many patients have insufficient skills to use eHealth information and that they especially have difficulties in formulating a search query, evaluating the quality of the information, and scanning a website for relevant information (Van der Varrt et al, 2013). These difficulties pose challenges for patients with low eHealth literacy and, ultimately, influence their health outcomes.…”

Inside Technology: Opening the Black Box of Health-Website Configuration and Content Management

“…This finding suggests that although the gap related to Internet access has narrowed, the divide related to Internet skills and types of use still exists [4,7]. Most of the findings about the partial use of the Internet are explained by users' characteristics such as low digital skills [8,9], eHealth literacy [10,11] and users age and education [12,13]. We suggest that factors other than user characteristics inhibit productive Internet use and are responsible for the existing gap.…”