2022
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2021.0371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring and Modeling Atmospheric Ammonia from Agricultural Sources at a Landscape Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These trends are consistent with other studies that found elevated concentrations of NH 3 in locations downwind of livestock production facilities [6,43]. Souhar et al [44] reported ambient NH 3 concentrations that varied between 2 and 105 µg m −3 across a landscape in Bretagne (France) that had a range of agricultural and livestock production intensities. Gradients of NH 3 concentrations downwind of a swine production facility ranged from 169 µg m −3 near the facility edge down to 13.0 µg m −3 698 m downwind due to both dispersion and deposition of NH 3 to the landscape [45].…”
Section: Ambient Ammonia Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These trends are consistent with other studies that found elevated concentrations of NH 3 in locations downwind of livestock production facilities [6,43]. Souhar et al [44] reported ambient NH 3 concentrations that varied between 2 and 105 µg m −3 across a landscape in Bretagne (France) that had a range of agricultural and livestock production intensities. Gradients of NH 3 concentrations downwind of a swine production facility ranged from 169 µg m −3 near the facility edge down to 13.0 µg m −3 698 m downwind due to both dispersion and deposition of NH 3 to the landscape [45].…”
Section: Ambient Ammonia Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Geometric mean bias (MG) and geometric variance (VG) are logarithmic indicators that are more flexible to data variations; furthermore, these parameters ensure that data sets are balanced, as they are utilized in Equations () and () 19,36 . MG measures mean relative bias indicates only systematic errors that result in overestimation (MG >1) or underestimation (MG <1) 37,38 MG=explnCotrue¯lnCptrue¯=exptrueln()CoCp¯, VG=exptrue()lnCogoodbreak−lnCp2¯=exptrue()ln()CoCp2¯ …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,36 MG measures mean relative bias indicates only systematic errors that result in overestimation (MG >1) or underestimation (MG <1). 37,38 MG…”
Section: Modeling Ammonia Performancementioning
confidence: 99%