2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06119-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring and reporting of vertebral endplate bone marrow lesions as seen on MRI (Modic changes): recommendations from the ISSLS Degenerative Spinal Phenotypes Group

Abstract: Purpose The positive association between low back pain and MRI evidence of vertebral endplate bone marrow lesions, often called Modic changes (MC), offers the exciting prospect of diagnosing a specific phenotype of chronic low back pain (LBP). However, imprecision in the reporting of MC has introduced substantial challenges, as variations in both imaging equipment and scanning parameters can impact conspicuity of MC. This review discusses key methodological factors that impact MC classification and recommends … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the moderate agreement on the extent of the high STIR signal is not optimal. Moderate inter-observer agreement is common in spine imaging (36,41,49,50), but it implies lowered accuracy when associations with clinical factors are sought (37). More reliable conclusive MRI findings can be based on different observers’ separate evaluations followed by their joint conclusion (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the moderate agreement on the extent of the high STIR signal is not optimal. Moderate inter-observer agreement is common in spine imaging (36,41,49,50), but it implies lowered accuracy when associations with clinical factors are sought (37). More reliable conclusive MRI findings can be based on different observers’ separate evaluations followed by their joint conclusion (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such data were included in articles on spondylarthritis (1)(2)(3)(4)(5), fractures (6), Modic changes (MCs) (7), hemangiomas (8), and pedicle screw loosening (9). However, all but one (6) of these reliability studies had only two observers, most (1,3-5,7-9) had small patient samples (n ¼ [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], only one (8) included measurements (of signal intensities); the spondylarthritis studies were limited to lesion detection (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). Reliability estimates differed widely in these heterogeneous studies where radiologists and non-radiologists interpreted various fat-suppressed 1.5-T or 3-T series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We developed, trained, and validated a deep learning model on a total of 57 IDEAL image data sets to automatically segment lumbar vertebral bodies from water-fat MRI data. Our main findings were ( 1 ) deep learning-based automatic segmentation of vertebral bodies was feasible in 16 ± 1 s; ( 2 ) the deep learning model segmented vertebral bodies with high accuracy (97.8%), precision (98.3%), and sensitivity (99.3–99.4%) when compared with manual segmentations; ( 3 ) the deep learning model showed good performance compared with standard manual analysis (mean DSC = 0.849 across 24 subjects); ( 4 ) the automatically segmented ROIs provided reliable quantification of bone marrow fat fraction (Bland Altman analysis: low bias and limits of agreements lower than 10% difference of the mean ground truth values); and ( 5 ) the automatic segmentation and BMF quantification workflow is highly repeatable between scans within the same subjects (precision error of 1.6% and ICC of 1.00). While only lumbar vertebrae were analyzed in our study, if other vertebral bodies in the thoracic or sacral regions were present in the field of view, these would also get segmented by our deep learning framework, suggesting applications for segmentation of other vertebral regions with bone marrow fat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This novel approach illustrates the need to use standardized and accurate imaging and measurement techniques to evaluate improvements in the lumbar spine in order to correlate improvements in pain and functional outcomes with regeneration of paravertebral structures [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%