Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1830483.1830643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring bloat, overfitting and functional complexity in genetic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
118
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of the experimental work is to test the NS-GP classifier on two-class classification problems, evaluating its performance based on classification error and the mean size of the evolved population, a good indicator of the effect bloating is having on a GP run [37]. The proposed algorithm will hereafter be denoted by NS-SRS.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the experimental work is to test the NS-GP classifier on two-class classification problems, evaluating its performance based on classification error and the mean size of the evolved population, a good indicator of the effect bloating is having on a GP run [37]. The proposed algorithm will hereafter be denoted by NS-SRS.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, bloat was assumed to be a good indicator of program overfitting. However, recent experimental work suggests that this assumption is not reliable [14]. In particular, [14] showed that a causal link between bloat and overfitting did not exist on three test cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, recent experimental work suggests that this assumption is not reliable [14]. In particular, [14] showed that a causal link between bloat and overfitting did not exist on three test cases. From this it follows that bloated programs should not be a priori regarded as complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations