2016
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2016.42.4.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Bond-Level Liquidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the literature. [Konstantinovsky et al, 2016] argued that recent and large issues are cheaper to trade than seasoned and small ones, so bond age and issue size matter. High-risk securities (i.e., bonds with wide spreads to Treasuries) tend to be more expensive to trade than low-risk ones.…”
Section: Results From Two-step Lasso Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the literature. [Konstantinovsky et al, 2016] argued that recent and large issues are cheaper to trade than seasoned and small ones, so bond age and issue size matter. High-risk securities (i.e., bonds with wide spreads to Treasuries) tend to be more expensive to trade than low-risk ones.…”
Section: Results From Two-step Lasso Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our third measure of liquidity, Liquidity Cost Score ( LCS ), is an estimate of transaction costs based on trader quotes. This measure (commercially offered by Barclays) uses the methodology introduced by Konstantinovsky, Ng, and Phelps (2016) and bid‐ask quotes data from Barclays trading desks 6 . LCS is an estimate of the cost of an institutional round‐lot transaction, measured as a percentage of the bond's price (hence a lower LCS signifies better liquidity).…”
Section: Sample and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%