2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1470443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Central Bank Communication: An Automated Approach with Application to FOMC Statements

Abstract: for their comments and suggestions, as well as participants at various seminars and Ken Kuttner, our discussant at the meeting of the NBER Monetary Economics Program. Isaac Laughlin provided outstanding research assistance. Hal Varian and the Google University Research Program provided generous access to the Google Search technology. The views and analysis set forth are solely those of the authors and do not indicate concurrence by other members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Francesc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
106
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative approach is used byLucca and Trebbi (2009), where FOMC statements are cut down into small segments of text, the semantic orientation of which is then calculated by checking how often these text segments appear in conjunction with the words dovish or hawkish in a large body of text.4 The scores are computed using scores from six subcategories, by adding the standardised word frequencies of the subcategories labelled as optimism increasing by DICTION (praise, satisfaction and inspiration), while our pessimism score is computed by adding the standardised word frequencies of the subcategories labelled optimism decreasing by DICTION (blame, hardship and denial). The Praise score, for example, includes words that isolate social qualities (witty), physical qualities (strong), intellectual qualities (reasonable), entrepreneurial qualities (successful) and moral qualities (good).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach is used byLucca and Trebbi (2009), where FOMC statements are cut down into small segments of text, the semantic orientation of which is then calculated by checking how often these text segments appear in conjunction with the words dovish or hawkish in a large body of text.4 The scores are computed using scores from six subcategories, by adding the standardised word frequencies of the subcategories labelled as optimism increasing by DICTION (praise, satisfaction and inspiration), while our pessimism score is computed by adding the standardised word frequencies of the subcategories labelled optimism decreasing by DICTION (blame, hardship and denial). The Praise score, for example, includes words that isolate social qualities (witty), physical qualities (strong), intellectual qualities (reasonable), entrepreneurial qualities (successful) and moral qualities (good).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used most in the field is (refined) dictionary approach. Lucca and Trebbi (2009) construct sentiment score using the content of FOMC announcements to predict fluctuations in treasury securities. To do this, they use dictionarybased methods: Google and Factiva semantic orientation scores.…”
Section: (I) Financementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems to be a good starting point for our technical analysis, especially for India where English is not the native language. 5 3 Other papers that study the tone of CB statements include Lucca and Trebbi (2009) for the US, and Galardo and Guerrieri (2017);Tobback et al (2017) for the ECB.…”
Section: Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%