2020
DOI: 10.1177/1362361320925334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring change in facial emotion recognition in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review

Abstract: Children and adults with autism spectrum disorder are less accurate in facial emotion recognition, which is thought to contribute to impairment in social functioning. Although many interventions have been developed to improve facial emotion recognition, there is no consensus on how to best measure facial emotion recognition in people with autism spectrum disorder. This lack of agreement has led to wide variability in how facial emotion recognition is measured and, subsequently, inconsistent findings related to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is the most widespread, and typically consists of static (images) or dynamic (brief videos) human face stimuli. Such tests have been widely used in different domains to assess level of impairment in recognition of facial movements in the presence of psychiatric ( Rocca et al, 2009 ) or movement ( Argaud et al, 2018 ) disorders, autism ( Wieckowski et al, 2020 ), and developmental disabilities ( Rojahn et al, 1995 ). It is essential to carefully select the task characteristics since they have been proven to influence performance ( Hayes et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is the most widespread, and typically consists of static (images) or dynamic (brief videos) human face stimuli. Such tests have been widely used in different domains to assess level of impairment in recognition of facial movements in the presence of psychiatric ( Rocca et al, 2009 ) or movement ( Argaud et al, 2018 ) disorders, autism ( Wieckowski et al, 2020 ), and developmental disabilities ( Rojahn et al, 1995 ). It is essential to carefully select the task characteristics since they have been proven to influence performance ( Hayes et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the centrality of social impairment in ASD, researchers have examined emotion‐recognition skills in this group and studies/reviews have documented a range of FER and VER deficits. Despite common testing of emotion recognition as both a characteristic of, and treatment outcome for children with ASD, there is a recognized need for studies assessing the psychometric characteristics of emotion‐recognition measures (Wieckowski et al, 2020). The use of a range of researcher‐created measures has contributed to some mixed findings and measures have been limited in their scope (basic emotions) and use of static photo stimuli (Harms et al, 2010; Lozier et al, 2014; Uljarevic & Hamilton, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have yielded variable results, which may be a function of the different measures utilized and/or dimensions assessed. Wieckowski et al (2020) evaluated the treatment sensitivity and emotion‐recognition measures used in FER intervention studies for ASD. Of the measures identified, the Cambridge Mindreading Face‐Voice Battery for Children (CAM‐C) was one of the most commonly used and treatment sensitive measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations