2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring consciousness: Is one measure better than the other?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
395
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 401 publications
(412 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(30 reference statements)
17
395
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, in respect of subjective visibility, we are following what is now a large body of literature that probes the strength of conscious experience using such measures (e.g., Lamy, et al, 2008;Overgaard, Rote, Mouridsen, & Ramsoy, 2006;Sergent & Dehaene, 2004) including carefully considered comparisons of different scales (Sandberg, Timmermans, Overgaard, & Cleeremans, 2010). Of most significance, participants seem to use the scales consistently, with little evidence of confusion on their part.…”
Section: Subjective Visibility Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, in respect of subjective visibility, we are following what is now a large body of literature that probes the strength of conscious experience using such measures (e.g., Lamy, et al, 2008;Overgaard, Rote, Mouridsen, & Ramsoy, 2006;Sergent & Dehaene, 2004) including carefully considered comparisons of different scales (Sandberg, Timmermans, Overgaard, & Cleeremans, 2010). Of most significance, participants seem to use the scales consistently, with little evidence of confusion on their part.…”
Section: Subjective Visibility Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a modified version of the perceptual awareness scale (Sandberg, Timmermans, Overgaard, & Cleeremans, 2010), participants rated the clarity with which they had experienced the lexical stimulus, choosing from the levels 'No Text', 'Blurry Text', 'Almost Clear Text' and 'Absolutely Clear Text' (which were assigned numerical values of 0 to 3, respectively, in our analysis).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants subsequently selected a colour from a 30×12 colour palette and then judged their colour experience "What was your COLOUR experience when you saw the symbol?" using the Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS; Sandberg, Timmermans, Overgaard, & Cleeremans, 2010), a four-point likert-type measure (1: "No experience"; 2: "Brief glimpse"; 3: "Almost clear image"; and 4: "Absolutely clear image"). Participants had unlimited time for the colour selection and experience judgment.…”
Section: Grapheme-colour Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%