2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11698-010-0059-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring core inflation in Italy comparing aggregate vs. disaggregate price data

Abstract: This paper focuses on the core inflation measurement in Italy using univariate (national-level inflation) vs. multivariate (city-level inflation) models during the period 1970-2006. We derive algebraic expressions that allow comparison between the reduced form parameters of univariate and multivariate local level models in the context of contemporaneous and temporal aggregation. We illustrate the relevance of these theoretical results for the empirical analysis of time series. Using Italian data, we find that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper shows that aggregating across second (or first)‐order (integrated) moving average processes leads to an aggregate process whose parameters are direct functions of the micro processes. That is, no iteration procedure is needed to recover the parameters of the aggregate process provided that the data generation process is known (similar results relative to the aggregation of first‐order moving average processes have been achieved by Ku and Seneta, , and Sbrana and Silvestrini, , ). Those results are shown in the next section, which considers the aggregation of both independent and dependent processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This paper shows that aggregating across second (or first)‐order (integrated) moving average processes leads to an aggregate process whose parameters are direct functions of the micro processes. That is, no iteration procedure is needed to recover the parameters of the aggregate process provided that the data generation process is known (similar results relative to the aggregation of first‐order moving average processes have been achieved by Ku and Seneta, , and Sbrana and Silvestrini, , ). Those results are shown in the next section, which considers the aggregation of both independent and dependent processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%