2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315594385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Corruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that measuring corruption is an activity that is fraught with methodological challenges (For more on measurement issues see Kaufmann, Kraay et al, 2006;Kaufmann, Kraay et al, 2007;Sampford, Shacklock et al, 2006). It is however important to try to measure corruption for two main reasons.…”
Section: Measurement Issues: a Cautionary Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that measuring corruption is an activity that is fraught with methodological challenges (For more on measurement issues see Kaufmann, Kraay et al, 2006;Kaufmann, Kraay et al, 2007;Sampford, Shacklock et al, 2006). It is however important to try to measure corruption for two main reasons.…”
Section: Measurement Issues: a Cautionary Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further considered that corruption and misconduct can be symptomatic of deeper distortions within society. Whilst bribery involved the physical movement of public funds and resources into private pockets, Sampford et al (2006) considered it was more important to be aware that corrupt payments have the capacity to influence public policy choices and decisions by officials (p. 1). It was their view, that corruption and misconduct should be pursued, not because it was a moral issue, but because all members of society paid the price for corruption in one way or another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampford, Shadlock, Connors and Galtung (2006) argued that corruption had the propensity to undermine 'the fairness, stability, and efficiency of a society and its ability to deliver sustainable development to its members' (p. 1). They further considered that corruption and misconduct can be symptomatic of deeper distortions within society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent findings have often confirmed this hypothesis (Paldam 2009;Uslaner 2002;Bjornskov 2007). I measure corruption with the commonly used corruption perception index published by Transparency International where scores within the range from 0 (highly cor-rupt) to 100 (very clean) are assigned to countries (Sampford et al 2006;Transparency International 2016). Several other additional national-level control variables not described below were added and tested.…”
Section: Gross Domestic Product (Gdp)mentioning
confidence: 97%