“…These data were integrated with administrative data obtained from various sources that include social service, criminal justice, health, mental health, alcohol and drug systems as well as information on involuntary examinations under the Florida Baker Act (civil commitment statue), and mortality. Numerous investigators have acknowledged the viability and advisability of administrative data to evaluate quality of care for large populations, given these data promote accuracy, impartiality, and cost savings (Kashner et al, 1999;Owen et al, 2003;Pandiani, Banks, Bramley, Pomeroy, & Simon, 2002;Unutzer et al, 2000). Some authors even more emphatically recommend that when evaluating mental health care, new data should only be collected if available administrative data are ''inaccessible, incomplete, or of poor quality,'' (Pandiani et al, 2002, p. 283).…”