2021
DOI: 10.1214/21-aos2065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring dependence in the Wasserstein distance for Bayesian nonparametric models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, one needs to build dependent random probability measures (see Quintana et al, 2022 for a recent review) with two key features in mind: (i) mathematical tractability, which corresponds to obtaining manageable representations for the posterior and/or the marginal structure, i.e., the partition distribution or the prediction rule; (ii) the ability to control the amount of dependence, since this is directly linked to the borrowing of information between the two groups: the more the dependence, the more information will be shared across the two groups. This is usually done by expressing the linear correlation between pairwise set-wise evaluations, Cor( P1 (A), P2 (A)) for any Borel set A, and has been recently extended to an arbitrary number of groups by relying on the Wasserstein distance (Catalano et al, 2021a(Catalano et al, , 2021b.…”
Section: Borrowing Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, one needs to build dependent random probability measures (see Quintana et al, 2022 for a recent review) with two key features in mind: (i) mathematical tractability, which corresponds to obtaining manageable representations for the posterior and/or the marginal structure, i.e., the partition distribution or the prediction rule; (ii) the ability to control the amount of dependence, since this is directly linked to the borrowing of information between the two groups: the more the dependence, the more information will be shared across the two groups. This is usually done by expressing the linear correlation between pairwise set-wise evaluations, Cor( P1 (A), P2 (A)) for any Borel set A, and has been recently extended to an arbitrary number of groups by relying on the Wasserstein distance (Catalano et al, 2021a(Catalano et al, , 2021b.…”
Section: Borrowing Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, copula-based dependence measurements are expressed as a discrepancy of the estimated copula from the independent case. Here, instead, we will consider the Wasserstein distance between a copula and the comonotonicity copula M. This perspective has been also recently considered in [36] in a Bayesian setting.…”
Section: Background On Optimal Transport Wasserstein Distance and Cop...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Wasserstein distance allows for a meaningful comparison between distributions also without density. This property is not shared by the most common distances and divergences, such as the total variation distance, the Hellinger distance, or the Kullback-Leibler divergence (see, e.g., [36]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%