2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring deterioration of small-area housing environment: Construction of a multi-dimensional assessment index and validation in shared refugee accommodation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surveyed participants were representative for the overall population in the state Baden-Wuerttemberg with respect to nationality, age, and sex as reported elsewhere. [2] All instruments used are internationally established and if not were validated separately[2, 26] and, if needed, underwent a rigorous translation and pre-testing process. [34] Individual level was accurately linked to collected contextual data or to geo-referenced data at highest level of resolution, as such minimising the risk of misclassification bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surveyed participants were representative for the overall population in the state Baden-Wuerttemberg with respect to nationality, age, and sex as reported elsewhere. [2] All instruments used are internationally established and if not were validated separately[2, 26] and, if needed, underwent a rigorous translation and pre-testing process. [34] Individual level was accurately linked to collected contextual data or to geo-referenced data at highest level of resolution, as such minimising the risk of misclassification bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SHED’s theoretical framework, its construction, piloting, and validation, including proven high intra- and interrater reliability, have been reported elsewhere in detail. [26] The composite SHED index score is calculated based on individual item’s z-transformation (to standardize item scores across different scales) and normalization (to scale all item scores in the range of 0–1). We then split the index score into four relative quartiles of distribution, ranging from Q1 (lowest) to Q4 (highest level of deterioration).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An instrument was developed to quantify the quality of housing in terms of its structural condition (small-area housing environment deterioration, SHED) and validated in a separate study [ 28 ]. Drawing on the Broken Windows Index [ 29 ], this instrument measures the condition of (1) window panes and glass, (2) walls and roof, (3) litter, (4) graffiti inside and outside the building, and (5) external spaces on the basis of five observer-based assessments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on the Broken Windows Index [ 29 ], this instrument measures the condition of (1) window panes and glass, (2) walls and roof, (3) litter, (4) graffiti inside and outside the building, and (5) external spaces on the basis of five observer-based assessments. The instrument has been shown to be highly reliable when conducted in the form of independent individual ratings [ 28 ]. In the context of this study, however, it was used as a rating by a team, as the joint work on site did not create an independent, but a combined impression of the residential environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying this index, RESPOND researchers assessed different domains of the physical environment of each collective accommodation centre visited. Based on the Broken-Window Index, the SHED measures the quality of windows, walls and outside spaces as well as the presence of garbage or graffities and an overall rating of the living environment on a scale from one to six (least to highest state of decay) (13). The geographical location was measured by the district the accommodation is located in, a binary variable indicating population density (below 150 inhabitants per km 2 were considered as rural, above this cut-off as urban following a definition of the Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR)), and the distance to shops, medical and administrative services by foot and with public transport (based on GoogleMaps (GM) connections).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%