1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2364(92)90210-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring diffusion in inhomogeneous systems in imaging mode using antisymmetric sensitizing gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have suggested that water diffusion, as measured by NMR, could be anisotropic due to local susceptibility-difference-induced gradients in the nerves and white matter. 32,33 Myelin and axonal membranes…”
Section: Postulated Sources and Investigation Of Diffusion Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others have suggested that water diffusion, as measured by NMR, could be anisotropic due to local susceptibility-difference-induced gradients in the nerves and white matter. 32,33 Myelin and axonal membranes…”
Section: Postulated Sources and Investigation Of Diffusion Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 The first evaluation of its potential contribution to white matter was performed by Trudeau et al on excised porcine spinal cord at 4.7 T. 46 By varying the orientation of the fibre tracts parallel or perpendicular to the static magnetic field (B o ), the background gradients could be minimized or maximized, respectively. The ADCs parallel or perpendicular to the fibres measured with the standard PGSE diffusion sequence were independent of the fibre orientation relative to B o and hence the induced gradients do not play a role in the anisotropy of diffusion in white matter.…”
Section: Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. It is worth noting that the nature of the diffusion gradients used in this pulse sequence make the resulting ADC measurements intrinsically insensitive to background and imaging gradient cross terms, according to the description by Hong and Dixon (25). The tetrahedral sampling of the diffusion tensor afforded maximal b-values for a given diffusion time and peak gradient amplitude, and provided sufficient information to compute the mean ADC (orientational mean, i.e, one-third the trace of the diffusion tensor), as originally described by Conturo et al (26).…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the background gradients can be assumed to be symmetric about zero, the normalized echo intensity is equal to: (4) where odd orders of background gradients are zero as a result of the assumed symmetric distribution of the background gradients, and terms with orders higher than quadratic can be neglected. Furthermore, we assume that the spatial variation of background gradients in random structures can be modeled by a correlation function , and the normalized echo intensity is equal to: (5) In order to illustrate the effects of background gradients upon the diffusion measurements, we assume that the temporal correlation and PDF of the background gradients can be modeled by and , respectively, where ζ is the characteristic correlation time and σ is the variance of the background gradients. Because ζ depends on the spin displacement rate, characteristic pore size, as well as the local structure, its exact analytical form may not be known.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such background gradients vary with the susceptibility mismatch and local structure of the system, and also depend upon the magnetic field strength at which the experiment is being conducted [4][5][6][7]. For instance, in heterogeneous systems studied at high magnetic field strengths, background gradients can be comparable to or possibly stronger than laboratory gradients; if not properly accounted for, these background gradients may introduce severe errors when diffusion NMR techniques are used to characterize local structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%