2015
DOI: 10.1037/rep0000022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring disability-associated appraisals for veterans with spinal cord injury.

Abstract: Study findings support the internal validity and a coherent 2-factor structure of the ADAPSS-sf in an outpatient Veteran population with chronic SCI/D. Additional research is warranted to test the clinical utility of the ADAPSS-sf with Veterans with SCI/D.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this study was to examine several facets of the ADAPSS−sf’s psychometric properties among U.S. military veterans with SCI. First, although a two-factor, superordinate structure has been observed for the ADAPSS (Dean & Kennedy, 2009) and the ADAPSS−sf (Mignogna et al, 2015), the study sample size was small in the latter study ( N = 98), and replication would strengthen confidence in the use of the short form and two subscales. In this study, it was anticipated that factor analysis would support a two-factor model of the ADAPSS−sf (Catastrophic Negativity and Determined Resilience; Hypothesis 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The purpose of this study was to examine several facets of the ADAPSS−sf’s psychometric properties among U.S. military veterans with SCI. First, although a two-factor, superordinate structure has been observed for the ADAPSS (Dean & Kennedy, 2009) and the ADAPSS−sf (Mignogna et al, 2015), the study sample size was small in the latter study ( N = 98), and replication would strengthen confidence in the use of the short form and two subscales. In this study, it was anticipated that factor analysis would support a two-factor model of the ADAPSS−sf (Catastrophic Negativity and Determined Resilience; Hypothesis 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Cognitive appraisals of adversity such as self-blame, uncontrollability, threat, catastrophic negativity, and challenge are particularly strong predictors of psychological adjustment following SCI (deRoon-Cassini, de St Aubin, Valvano, Hastings, & Brasel, 2013; Galvin & Godfrey, 2001; Kennedy et al, 2012; Mignogna, Christie, Holmes, & Ames, 2015; Peter et al, 2014; van Leeuwen, Kraaijeveld, Lindeman, & Post, 2012). People instinctively, and constantly, evaluate their environment and self-assess for indications of threat and of well-being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ADAPSS-SF [48] is a self-evaluative measure of SCI impact and disability that is used to determine how patients perceive their own coping resources, the perceived adequacy of such resources and the likelihood that these can be employed effectively [49][50][51]. The measure comprises six items and has a 6-point Likert scale to measure how participants perceive their sense of disability in the context of their SCI.…”
Section: Appraisals Of Disability Primary and Secondary Scaleshort Fomentioning
confidence: 99%