2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1511304112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring dynamic cell–material interactions and remodeling during 3D human mesenchymal stem cell migration in hydrogels

Abstract: Biomaterials that mimic aspects of the extracellular matrix by presenting a 3D microenvironment that cells can locally degrade and remodel are finding increased applications as wound-healing matrices, tissue engineering scaffolds, and even substrates for stem cell expansion. In vivo, cells do not simply reside in a static microenvironment, but instead, they dynamically reengineer their surroundings. For example, cells secrete proteases that degrade extracellular components, attach to the matrix through adhesiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
205
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
205
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) The 3D scaffold may allow generation of mechanical force by NPCs in response to their environment (11). (iii) The 3D environment provides a high surface area for growth and migration (35), which can be tuned to support other cell behaviors, such as differentiation or maturation. In vivo-like cell−cell interactions may lead to more realistic gene expression and cellular behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) The 3D scaffold may allow generation of mechanical force by NPCs in response to their environment (11). (iii) The 3D environment provides a high surface area for growth and migration (35), which can be tuned to support other cell behaviors, such as differentiation or maturation. In vivo-like cell−cell interactions may lead to more realistic gene expression and cellular behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we observed significant matrix remodeling via repeated compressive testing in High hydrogels seeded with the highest MSC density, no clear trends were observed in the Low or Med conditions. Recent results from Schultz et al described non-uniform matrix remodeling [93] as a result of differences in diffusive path lengths and reaction times for MMPs vs. TIMPs. This suggests remodeling of our hydrogels was likely non-uniform, making it difficult to resolve local remodeling processes within the heterotypic HSC-MSC cultures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular composition was selected because of frequent and broad use of RGDS for promoting the adhesion and survival of cells within synthetic matrices and the previous observation of cell spreading over days within this matrix density, suggesting some degree of cell-driven remodeling of the initial matrix. 17 With this approach now established, the effects of different peptides or matrix densities and moduli on the profile of secreted proteins may be examined in future studies. Further, if an alternative synthetic matrix is used, materials for cell encapsulation should be prepared per standard procedures for that system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%