2018
DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2018.1484664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring experiential qualities of urban public spaces: users’ perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature described two approaches to achieving effective engagement in POSs. The first is "engagement with space", and the second is "engagement with community" [24,43,44,59]. If POS accommodates activities according to users' needs, then users effectively engage with space [60,61].…”
Section: Public Open Space Index (Posi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature described two approaches to achieving effective engagement in POSs. The first is "engagement with space", and the second is "engagement with community" [24,43,44,59]. If POS accommodates activities according to users' needs, then users effectively engage with space [60,61].…”
Section: Public Open Space Index (Posi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A self-administered questionnaire survey, a quantitative approach that helps to understand the users' perceptions of POS. A self-administered questionnaire survey allows the researcher to gain a better understanding of a POS's functional and aesthetic capabilities from the perspective of users [43,59,63]. Aself-administered questionnaire assists respondents to complete the response themselves without the intervention of the researcher.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to understand whether there is a direct influence of the perception of urban public spaces space on momentary and long-term SWB, people’s characteristics of momentary experiences should be measured. It is recognized that studies that take into account momentary user experiences of public spaces in real-world settings, are limited [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is explored mostly through its accessibility, design, freedom of use, and inclusiveness [10,[12][13][14] characteristics that result from ownership status, location, and the way the space is organized, equipped, and managed. The literature review [9,11,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] provides at least a few models (tools) for assessing the degree of publicness of a space, based on different publicness criteria (Table 1). For some models, the set of criteria includes both the physical attributes of space and the degree to which the space fulfils its social function.…”
Section: Publicness Of Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous studies on the prosocial character of space [34][35][36][37][38][39]. The efficiency of the space usage has so far been estimated based on subjective perception, including gauging the quality and performance of public space only on the basis of user experiences and inputs gathered through surveys [22,40], but also measurable criteria related to the number, type, and intensity of behaviors [41,42]. Assuming that the measurement of the prosocial character of space should refer to the category of behavior, we can assess the utility value of space by social behaviors.…”
Section: Utility Value Of Spacementioning
confidence: 99%