2003
DOI: 10.13031/2013.12537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Fat Content of Ground Beef Stream Using On–line Visible/Nir Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding %SEP with respect to mean were 7.6% for cholesterol, 7.1% for fat, 2.1% for calorie, and 4.6% for moisture, all fairly small. The %SEP was below the range of the 3.8-5.3% reported for calories, but higher than the <1%, 2.3%, and up to 3% reported for fat and moisture in ground or emulsified beef (Lanza, 1983;Anderson and Walker, 2003;Clark and Short, 1994). This study used a significantly broader range of fat and moisture levels, compared to the studies reported above.…”
Section: Initial Plsr Modelscontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The corresponding %SEP with respect to mean were 7.6% for cholesterol, 7.1% for fat, 2.1% for calorie, and 4.6% for moisture, all fairly small. The %SEP was below the range of the 3.8-5.3% reported for calories, but higher than the <1%, 2.3%, and up to 3% reported for fat and moisture in ground or emulsified beef (Lanza, 1983;Anderson and Walker, 2003;Clark and Short, 1994). This study used a significantly broader range of fat and moisture levels, compared to the studies reported above.…”
Section: Initial Plsr Modelscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…In meat products, NIRS has been used for sensory analysis and nutrient labeling (Ortiz-Somovilla et al, 2007;Uddin et al, 2006;Park et al, 1998;Osborne, 1981). Most of the NIRS research on beef was focused on estimation of fat, protein, and moisture content of beef in either steak, emulsified or ground form (Anderson and Walker, 2003;Togerson et al, 2003;Clark and Short, 1994;Mitsumoto et al, 1991;Lanza, 1983). Most of these studies showed correlation coefficients above 0.90 for chemometric models based on spectral data to predict fat, moisture and calories, and standard error of prediction (SEP) of less than 3% for fat and moisture content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the purpose of eliminating blending steps and improving the quality of blended beef, Anderson and Walker (2003a) applied the Perten DA700 NIR/VIS analysis system for measuring fat content in ground beef in the moving stream of meat formed by a grinder equipped with a custom forming head. The measurements on 27 kg blocks of beef achieved high accuracy with SEP (Standard Error of Prediction) of 1.00-1.68% for the calibration set and 2.15-2.28% for the validation set.…”
Section: Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alomar, Gallo, Castaneda, and Fuchslocher (2003) investigated the prediction ability of NIRS for chemical compositions of raw beef meats. Anderson and Walker (2003) also studied the application of on-line VIS/NIR spectroscopy to determine the fat content in ground beef stream and reported a high accuracy with standard error of prediction (SEP) of 1.00-1.68% for calibration and 2.15-2.28% for validation. Yavari, Hamedi, and Haghbin (2009) using VIS/NIR hyper-spectral analysis studied the quality of used frying oils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%