2004
DOI: 10.1177/1094428104269175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Gender Composition in Work Groups: A Comparison of Existing Methods

Abstract: Reviewing research on diversity and relational demography in teams and work groups, the authors compare different ways of measuring gender composition and demonstrate that existing practice can be theoretically biased. The authors conclude that within group-level analyses, the proportion of women should be used; whereas within individual-level analyses, the appropriate approach depends on whether a gender-by-gender composition interaction effect is found. The generalizability of this approach to other types of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical maximum for H depends on the total number of categories (s) (Williams & Meân, 2004), but nationality was recoded in a dichotomous way (Dutch/non-Dutch students), therefore for both team diversity types s ϭ 2. The higher the values of the H index, the higher the team's diversity.…”
Section: Study 1 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical maximum for H depends on the total number of categories (s) (Williams & Meân, 2004), but nationality was recoded in a dichotomous way (Dutch/non-Dutch students), therefore for both team diversity types s ϭ 2. The higher the values of the H index, the higher the team's diversity.…”
Section: Study 1 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the arguments presented in Williams and Mean (2004) we used the proportion of women in the group as an index for gender diversity. This measure is suitable to evaluate the effect of gender differences because it captures any nature of the effect and allows for an unbiased examination of the data (Williams and Mean 2004, p. 466).…”
Section: Proportion Of Women In the Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasoning behind this strategy is that increasing team diversity increases the elaboration of task-relevant information by bringing in different perspectives and will ultimately increase team performance in a complex knowledge production task (Hambrick et al 1998;Harrison and Klein 2007). The diversity index was computed using a formula proposed by Teachman (1980), widely used in the team diversity literature (Williams and Meân 2004) and illustrative for the conceptualization of diversity as variety (Harrison and Klein 2007). The theoretical maximum for the diversity index (H) depends on the total number of categories within a group (Williams and Meân 2004).…”
Section: Independent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%