2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring General Surgery Residents’ Communication Skills From the Patient’s Perspective Using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Levinson et al (2013) got 2794 citations and 74 full-text articles, 21 studies and 13 companion reports; Liu et al (2015) retrieved 20 studies; Mazzi et al (2013) reported on one full-day observation with 259 people (but only four interviews were analysed); Taveira-Gomes et al (2016) researched on 255 students attending the course on basic communication skills but thenafter three years -only 68 people from the same population completed the re-evaluation interview. Stausmire et al (2015) researched 93 residents (representing 59 institutions) participating in the communication training but finally only 11 of them volunteered to participate in a role-playing session before and after the formal teaching session. This leads to the statement that research on communication skills of physicians is in its initial stage and should be intensified.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Levinson et al (2013) got 2794 citations and 74 full-text articles, 21 studies and 13 companion reports; Liu et al (2015) retrieved 20 studies; Mazzi et al (2013) reported on one full-day observation with 259 people (but only four interviews were analysed); Taveira-Gomes et al (2016) researched on 255 students attending the course on basic communication skills but thenafter three years -only 68 people from the same population completed the re-evaluation interview. Stausmire et al (2015) researched 93 residents (representing 59 institutions) participating in the communication training but finally only 11 of them volunteered to participate in a role-playing session before and after the formal teaching session. This leads to the statement that research on communication skills of physicians is in its initial stage and should be intensified.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of organisational and cultural differences notwithstanding, one may maintain, that some already existing tools like communication assessment tools (CAT) can be used by various health care providers (Stausmire et al, 2015), and some of the peer-review tools, for example, SPRAT (Sheffield peer-review assessment tool) proved to be useful internationally as well (Sasaki et al, 2015).…”
Section: Elements Of a Physician Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the CG-CAHPS questions are indeed the appropriate outcome measure for assessing the impact of house staff’s use of a step-by-step protocol for opening medical interviews is debatable (4,22). However, given the now ubiquitous nature of the CAHPS surveys in the United States, understanding how communication training may or may not impact CAHPS scores in house staff clinics and other teaching services will likely be important moving forward (2) with other measures for assessing the value of training initiatives and giving direct feedback to trainees on communication skills being collected in parallel (15 18,20,23). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 It has demonstrated utility in assessing communication skills in surgery and family medicine residents. 18,19 The CAT has also been administered to ED patients and captures the patient's perspective on the overall Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 20 During the study period, trained research assistants (RA) administered the CAT survey and free-response questions to ED patients cared for primarily by a fourth-year clerkship student. We implemented a system whereby a text page notification was sent to the RA team when a student signed up for a patient on our ED's electronic tracking board.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%