2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

14
215
0
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
14
215
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the conceptual distinction between positive feeling and positive functioning, the two have been found to be highly correlated, with relationships as high as .76 and .84 reported (Linley, Maltby, Wood, Osborne & Hurling, 2009;Keyes, Shmotkin & Ryff, 2002). Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that well-being indicators, which are typically categorized as positive feeling and positive functioning, may be explained by a single higher-order or "general" factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Despite the conceptual distinction between positive feeling and positive functioning, the two have been found to be highly correlated, with relationships as high as .76 and .84 reported (Linley, Maltby, Wood, Osborne & Hurling, 2009;Keyes, Shmotkin & Ryff, 2002). Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that well-being indicators, which are typically categorized as positive feeling and positive functioning, may be explained by a single higher-order or "general" factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Life satisfaction, which forms the cognitive assessment of satisfaction by one's standing in life and which is a key indicator of subjective well-being (Linley, Maltby, Wood, Osborne and Hurling, 2009), is conceptualized as a construct representing positive evaluation of the quality of one's life as a whole (Diener, Emmons, Larsen and Griffin, 1985;Diener, Suh, Lucas, and Smith, 1999;McDowell, 2010;Pavot and Diener, 1993). levels of life satisfaction determinants (Rothmann, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some skepticism exists regarding the degree to which eudaimonic and hedonic well-being can be meaningfully separated because they may overlap conceptually and share underlying psychological mechanisms (Kashdan, Biswas-Diener, & King, 2008). However, other research suggests that a distinction can be made (Keyes & Annas, 2009;Keyes, Shmotkin, & Ryff, 2002;Linley, Maltby, Wood, Osborne, & Hurling, 2009;Ryff & Keyes, 1995).Other positive factors may be considered under the broad category of PPWB but are not easily classified into the eudaimonic or hedonic approaches to well-being. These include constructs like optimism and vitality, which may contain elements of both eudaimonic and hedonic well-being, but are not pure measures of either.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%