2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-007-9152-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring health-related quality of life in drug clinical trials: is it given due importance?

Abstract: HRQL measures are not used on a regular basis in drug clinical trials that are reported in the relevant literature. Systematic incorporation of QOL measures into clinical trials would make it possible to measure the benefit obtained from drug treatments taking into account the patients' perceptions. Moreover, it would encourage the development of prospective cost-effectiveness studies with patient recorded data in the context of clinical trials. Our findings have a direct impact on practice. Being conscious of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As an indicator of health and living standards, the concept and connotations of QOL were defined in multiple ways because of different research objectives and purpose, QOL is a multidimensional concept that can fully reflect person’s overall health situation by measuring four dimensions: physical health, physiological health, social health, and mental health. Nowadays, QOL is viewed as a significant outcome of health care and has been increasingly used as a comprehensive health indicator in medical interventions and population health surveys [ 2 ]. QOL is mainly used in evaluation of health status and health resources and used as an aspect of influencing factors and health intervention measures, which have higher stability and sensitivity [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an indicator of health and living standards, the concept and connotations of QOL were defined in multiple ways because of different research objectives and purpose, QOL is a multidimensional concept that can fully reflect person’s overall health situation by measuring four dimensions: physical health, physiological health, social health, and mental health. Nowadays, QOL is viewed as a significant outcome of health care and has been increasingly used as a comprehensive health indicator in medical interventions and population health surveys [ 2 ]. QOL is mainly used in evaluation of health status and health resources and used as an aspect of influencing factors and health intervention measures, which have higher stability and sensitivity [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QOL indicated that how individuals intuitively evaluate their health as well as their ability to perform physical, psychological, and social functions [5][6][7]. Currently, QOL is measured for judge about outcome as a comprehensive health indicator in medical interventions and health surveys [8]. The health of human societies is affected by many factors such as economic development, social and cultural factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The health of human societies is affected by many factors such as economic development, social and cultural factors. One of them is health literacy, which is a term introduced by the American Medical Association in 1970 [8,9]. Health literacy is defines as "a constellation of skills, including the ability to perform basic reading and numerical tasks required to function in the health care environment" [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against this backdrop, it is surprising that only 1 out of 5 eczema trials include QoL instruments, particularly since similar figures are obtained for different diseases in other fields of medicine. For example, one study found that 16% of drug clinical trials published in 2005 in 5 high quality journals included QoL measures (102). However, most of these studies reported on heart disease, cancer or other serious illnesses where "hard" outcomes are available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%