Measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: South Sudan 2011–15

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Health systems resilience (HSR) is defined as the ability of a health system to continue providing normal services in response to a crisis, making it a critical concept for analysis of health systems in fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS). However, no consensus for this definition exists and even less about how to measure HSR. We examine three current HSR definitions (maintaining function, improving function and achieving health system targets) using real-time data from South Sudan to develop a data-driven understanding of resilience. We used 14 maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) coverage indicators from household surveys in South Sudan collected at independence (2011) and following 2 years of protracted conflict (2015), to construct a resilience index (RI) for 9 of the former 10 states and nationally. We also assessed health system stress using conflict-related indicators and developed a stress index. We cross tabulated the two indices to assess the relationship of resilience and stress. For maintaining function for 80% of MNCH indicators, seven state health systems were resilient, compared with improving function for 50% of the indicators (two states were resilient). Achieving the health system national target of 50% coverage in half of the MNCH indicators displayed no resilience. MNCH coverage levels were low, with state averages ranging between 15% and 44%. Central Equatoria State displayed high resilience and high system stress. Lakes and Northern Bahr el Ghazal displayed high resilience and low stress. Jonglei and Upper Nile States had low resilience and high stress. This study is the first to investigate HSR definitions using a resilience metric and to simultaneously measure health system stress in FCAS. Improving function is the HSR definition detecting the greatest variation in the RI. HSR and health system stress are not consistently negatively associated. HSR is highly complex warranting more in-depth analyses in FCAS.</jats:p>

The use of health facility data to assess the effects of armed conflicts on maternal and child health: experience from the Kivu, DR Congo

“…Users' fees, as applied in DRC, may therefore represent an important barrier to access to health services. Second, the health system in eastern DRC provinces is reportedly better funded than in other provinces, mainly thanks to humanitarian aid [57,58]. In some conflictaffected HZ, RMNCH services are totally subsidised by non-governmental organisations, often waiving users' fees.…”

Healthcare system resilience in Bangladesh and Haiti in times of global changes (climate-related events, migration and Covid-19): an interdisciplinary mixed method research protocol

“…Concerning secondary data (SARA and DHMIS), the health systems resilience analysis will be carried out in relation to their capacity to maintain the use of care by populations. We will rely on DHMIS data to conduct interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) or difference-in-differences methods (when control groups will be available) - using the main events identified during the exploratory phase as interruptions – to examine changes in health service utilisation indicators over time [ 47 ]. Like Odhiambo et al [ 47 ], we will seek to collectively determine thresholds for each of the dimensions of our resilience scale (e.g.…”

Resilience of health systems in conflict affected governorates of Iraq, 2014–2018

“…A 2019 qualitative analysis examined the capacity of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) to accommodate the needs of a sudden influx of Palestinian refugees and also the capacity to provide services inside Syria [ 12 , 13 ]. A data-driven approach was used by Odhiambo et al [ 14 ] to measure health systems resilience in South Sudan. A systems dynamics approach was used by Ager and colleagues to assess health service resilience in Yobe state, Nigeria, in the context of the Boko Haram insurgency [ 15 ].…”