2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring HRM effectiveness: Considering multiple stakeholders in a global context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
76
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, globalized industries and organizations operate across different regulatory environments, and must manage different standards for managing and learning from risk (Colakoglu, Lepak, & Hong, 2006). A single organization can be required to work to different safety standards depending on the location of operations, which potentially creates confusion and uncertainty around practices such as safety inspections (Harzing, 2006).…”
Section: National Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, globalized industries and organizations operate across different regulatory environments, and must manage different standards for managing and learning from risk (Colakoglu, Lepak, & Hong, 2006). A single organization can be required to work to different safety standards depending on the location of operations, which potentially creates confusion and uncertainty around practices such as safety inspections (Harzing, 2006).…”
Section: National Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Colakoglu et al (2006), performance outcomes vary in terms of two aspects: first, their proximity to employee contributions or the level of aggregation in which they are measured, and second, the relevant stakeholder group of focus. Our focus of attention in terms of the purpose of that paper is just the first aspect.…”
Section: The Nature Of Constructs: Hrm and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards HRM, it should be admitted that traditionally HRM function has been viewed as a cost to be reduced [3], however, the growth of beliefs and evidence that "how people are managed can make the difference" [17] enhances the value of HRM. Acknowledging that the majority of the researches define HRM in terms of HRM practices or bundles of practices [18], still no consensus exist on what HRM practices are definitively essential to HRM [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nature of working is defined by "content of career or career's characteristics". Based on view of human resources management, activities of human resources management such as reducing organization's size, outsourcing and temporary recruitment have impacts on nature and limits of career [22]. Reducing organization's size and rebuilding structures of firms that are implemented to decrease in work force and directed to improve organizational performance are resulted to dissatisfaction of employees in regard of their own career.…”
Section: Happiness At Workmentioning
confidence: 99%