2006
DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxj001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Immunization Coverage among Preschool Children: Past, Present, and Future Opportunities

Abstract: Control of vaccine-preventable diseases depends on maintaining high levels of immunization coverage. Immunization coverage among preschool children remains suboptimal in some areas and sociodemographic subgroups, as well as for more recently introduced vaccines, leaving susceptible young children vulnerable to complications from vaccine-preventable diseases. This paper reviews approaches historically used to measure immunization coverage among preschool children in the United States. The strengths and weakness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…NMEs to immunization have been on the rise in many states in recent years, including California. [13][14][15][16][17] Correlations between the ease of obtaining NMEs and the rates of NMEs have been demonstrated. 13,14,18,19 From 2000 to 2010, California' s NME rates more than tripled from 0.77% to 2.33%, with some schools reporting NME rates as high as 84% in 2010.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…NMEs to immunization have been on the rise in many states in recent years, including California. [13][14][15][16][17] Correlations between the ease of obtaining NMEs and the rates of NMEs have been demonstrated. 13,14,18,19 From 2000 to 2010, California' s NME rates more than tripled from 0.77% to 2.33%, with some schools reporting NME rates as high as 84% in 2010.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, Washington is 1 of a few states that permit school data to be entered by families themselves, which can result in inaccuracies. 20 Second, reporting of school data often occurs before final immunization statuses are complete (thus leading to potential underestimates of coverage). Third, most states do not include homeschooled children in their school exemption data 21 ; yet, vaccine refusal can be particularly pronounced among families that homeschool, 22,23 and VPDs are known to occur in these settings.…”
Section: School Exemption Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Childhood Immunization Initiative Act of 1993 was originally introduced to Congress with language to do just this, but this language was later changed to instead allocate funding for states to establish their own registries. 20,33 The main benefit of a national registry is that it can help medical and public health officials more easily gauge local trends in immunization and detect clusters of unimmunized individuals. 34 This is evident from the experience of countries with national immunization registries, including Australia and many countries in Western Europe.…”
Section: Establishment Of a National Immunization Registrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Immunization Survey (NIS) -the gold standard tool for monitoring vaccine uptake among children aged 19-35 months -is typically constrained to producing coarse state-level estimates. 1 In recent years, vaccine hesitancy (i.e., a desire to delay or refuse vaccination, despite availability of vaccination services) 2 has resurged in the United States, challenging the maintenance of herd immunity. In December 2014, foreign importation of the measles virus to Disney theme parks in Orange County, California resulted in an outbreak of 111 measles cases, 45% of which were among unvaccinated individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%