2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring inappropriate medical diagnosis and treatment in survey data: The case of ADHD among school-age children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
165
3
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
16
165
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, based on 3 samples of large scale cross-sectional US survey data, Evans et al found that children 7 to 17 years old whose birthday fell in the 120 days before school eligibility cutoff date had, compared with those born in the 120 days after cutoff, double the chance of being diagnosed with or treated for ADHD. 9 These findings corroborate our results. Whether children who start stimulant treatment for ADHD benefit academically is a topic of another study, but our previous results indicate that earlier treatment is associated with a lower risk of decline in academic performance.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, based on 3 samples of large scale cross-sectional US survey data, Evans et al found that children 7 to 17 years old whose birthday fell in the 120 days before school eligibility cutoff date had, compared with those born in the 120 days after cutoff, double the chance of being diagnosed with or treated for ADHD. 9 These findings corroborate our results. Whether children who start stimulant treatment for ADHD benefit academically is a topic of another study, but our previous results indicate that earlier treatment is associated with a lower risk of decline in academic performance.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4 However, more recent studies suggest that a relative maturity disadvantage in childhood could have longlasting negative effects on personal achievements and health outcomes. [5][6][7] In addition, recent evidence suggests that the youngest children in the classroom are more often treated for attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), 8,9 a childhood diagnosis that may have lasting effects through adolescence and into adulthood. 10,11 Even when the long-term benefits of being older relative to peers are still unclear, children are sometimes redshirted (ie, parents hold them back for a year before entering school) so that they will be more mature and thus start off with an academic, social, and physical advantage.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…born just before the cut-off) are at a greater risk of ADHD diagnosis than children who are relatively old for the grade (i.e. born just after the cut-off) (Evans, Morrill, & Parente, 2010). And third, children living in states with more stringent school accountability laws are more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD (Bokhari & Schneider, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies (Elder, 2010; Evans, Morrill, & Parente, 2010; Halldner et al, 2014; Morrow et al, 2012; Zoëga, Valdimarsdóttir, & Hernández-Díaz, 2012) showed that relative age is a significant determinant of ADHD diagnosis and treatment. Overall, the youngest children in class are twice as likely as their classmates to receive a diagnosis of ADHD and medication.…”
Section: Birth Month Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%