2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-019-0383-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring intolerance to mutation in human genetics

Abstract: In numerous applications, from working with animal models to mapping the genetic basis of human disease susceptibility, it is useful to know whether a single disrupting mutation in a gene is likely to be deleterious. With this goal in mind, a number of measures have been developed to identify genes in which protein-truncating variants (PTVs), or other types of mutations, are absent or kept at very low frequency in large population samples—genes that appear “intolerant to mutation”. One measure in particular, p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
120
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
7
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pLI score for a gene measures the probability of intolerance to (generally heterozygous) loss-of-function mutations in that gene, as inferred from patterns of variation in ultra-deep human exome sequencing data 58 . pLI scores can be used to differentiate between haploinsufficient and haplosufficient genes or, similarly, between dosage-sensitive and insensitive genes 58 (although, strictly speaking, the scores are directly informative only about the strength of selection acting on heterozygotes 62 ). By contrast, phastCons scores simply measure a reduction in fixed derived alleles, and do not effectively differentiate among various forms of negative selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pLI score for a gene measures the probability of intolerance to (generally heterozygous) loss-of-function mutations in that gene, as inferred from patterns of variation in ultra-deep human exome sequencing data 58 . pLI scores can be used to differentiate between haploinsufficient and haplosufficient genes or, similarly, between dosage-sensitive and insensitive genes 58 (although, strictly speaking, the scores are directly informative only about the strength of selection acting on heterozygotes 62 ). By contrast, phastCons scores simply measure a reduction in fixed derived alleles, and do not effectively differentiate among various forms of negative selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It became clear during this era that these diseases are highly variable even among members of the same family (Lejeune et al ., ). The exact numbers of HI genes and HI diseases in humans are unknown, partly due to the difficulty of systematically distinguishing HI from other forms of dominant inheritance (Fuller et al ., ). However, known HI genes are clearly diverse in function (Veitia, Caburet, & Birchler, ).…”
Section: Introduction: the Basics Of Genetic Dominancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…A powerful way of gaining insight into a gene's contribution to organismal homeostasis is by studying the fitness effect exerted by loss-of-function (LoF) variants in that gene. Fully characterizing this effect is challenging, as it requires estimation of both the selection coefficient for individuals with biallelic LoF variants, as well as the dominance coefficient (Falconer, Mackay, 1996;Fuller et al, 2019). However, recent studies based on the joint processing and analysis of large numbers of exome sequences have developed metrics which serve as approximations to genic LoF-intolerance in humans (Petrovski et al, 2013;Lek et al, 2016;Karczewski et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%