2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-007-9126-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Intraoral Pressure: Adaptation of a Dental Appliance Allows Measurement During Function

Abstract: This article introduces a new way of recording intraoral pressures from a range of locations within the oral cavity. To measure pressure flow dynamics during swallowing, we fitted eight miniature pressure transducers capable of measuring absolute pressures to a chrome-cobalt palatal appliance with a labial bow. Unlike previous devices, our design provides a rigid, custom-fitted platform for the simultaneous recording of pressures at eight locations within the oral cavity during function. We placed an anterior … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
4
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
50
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many instruments have been developed to quantify tongue force using different technologies, such as dynamometers (Posen 1972;Trawitzki et al 2010), bulbs (Bu Sha et al 2000Hayashi et al 2002;Clark et al 2003;Ball et al 2006;Utanohara et al 2008), palatal plates (Hori et al 2006;Hewitt et al 2008;Kieser et al 2008), strain gauges (Kydd 1956;Sanders 1968;Dworkin 1980;Robinovitch et al 1991;Scardella et al 1993) and others. Each one has its advantages and disadvantages and can measure maximum tongue force in a different direction and sometimes force during function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many instruments have been developed to quantify tongue force using different technologies, such as dynamometers (Posen 1972;Trawitzki et al 2010), bulbs (Bu Sha et al 2000Hayashi et al 2002;Clark et al 2003;Ball et al 2006;Utanohara et al 2008), palatal plates (Hori et al 2006;Hewitt et al 2008;Kieser et al 2008), strain gauges (Kydd 1956;Sanders 1968;Dworkin 1980;Robinovitch et al 1991;Scardella et al 1993) and others. Each one has its advantages and disadvantages and can measure maximum tongue force in a different direction and sometimes force during function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The palatal plate developed by Kieser et al (2008) was designed to simultaneously measure pressure at diverse locations in the mouth and was constructed from a chrome-cobalt alloy. To measure pressure during swallowing, an anterior pair of gauges measured lingual and labial contact against the left central incisor tooth, while two pairs of gauges measured pressure contributions of the lateral tongue margin and cheeks on the canine and first molar teeth.…”
Section: Instruments Described In the Literature To Measure Tongue Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,[21][22][23] In order to characterize the robustness of the distinctive parameters, the variation of measurements was analyzed on the basis of a series of three-time repeated pressure monitoring of three subjects of the control group (Table 1). Figure 1.…”
Section: Methods Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,[21][22][23] Although statistical analyses yielded significant differences between pressure characteristics of the groups, the robustness of pressure parameters needs to be considered in interpreting the data.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el análisis de los datos, las fases de meseta y peaks de presión, presiones diferenciadas y media bajo la curva fueron calculadas. Las fases de meseta incluyeron una oscilación de presión menor a 5 mbar/s y la duración de al menos 5 s, a fin de distinguir las fases de meseta y la duración de la deglución normal (Kieser et al, 2008). Los peaks se definieron como un cambio en la presión de al menos 5 mbar/s en 2 segundos, y un segundo cambio (disminución) de al menos 5 mbar/s dentro de los 5 s después del inicio del cambio.…”
Section: Método De Controlunclassified