2016
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i48/109307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Leaf Area using Otsu Segmentation Method (LAMOS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2012) or Visual C++ in Haqqiman Radzali et al. (2016)) or user adjustments (e.g. Schrader et al., 2017), the full automation of FAMeLeS enabled high‐precision measurements on thousands of leaves, including isolated leaves or multiple leaves scanned at once, regardless of the number of leaves in the image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2012) or Visual C++ in Haqqiman Radzali et al. (2016)) or user adjustments (e.g. Schrader et al., 2017), the full automation of FAMeLeS enabled high‐precision measurements on thousands of leaves, including isolated leaves or multiple leaves scanned at once, regardless of the number of leaves in the image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of leaf area measurements errors between methods on a set of 145 leaves belonging to 69 species.The accuracy of FAMeLeS on images from field sampling mixed with web images attests to the efficiency of the method even with images from multiple devices (scanner or photographs). While some authors warned about the limitation of their method depending on image quality(Meira et al, 2020) or brightness(Haqqiman Radzali et al, 2016), FAMeLeS has proven to be very tolerant of the di-versity of image sizes (compressed or not), resolutions and lighting conditions which makes it possible to work on existing leaf image databases or to aggregate data sets from different sources. The combination of such a high tolerance to image type and leaf characteristics offers the opportunity to build standardized database of leaf binary images from any biome, and to produce high amounts of data to address functional ecology questions, to study biogeographical patterns and drivers of morphological leaf traits and to feed allometric models and algorithms of plant leaf classification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of such methods, a number of climatic, atmospheric parameters, or other external factors, can influence the accuracy according to which the leaf area is determined [92][93][94]. At the same time, these methods are very expensive because they require specialized equipment and certain calibration works, but they offer the possibility determining the leaf area and derived indices (leaf area index-LAI, leaf area duration-LAD, net assimilation rate-NAR, specific leaf area-SLA, specific leaf weight-SLW) over relatively large areas [84,[95][96][97].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf thickness was measured using a digital vernier caliper, making sure to avoid the leaf midribs. Leaf area was measured by drawing a leaf outline on A4-sized paper and measuring the area of leaves by the grid method (Radzali et al 2016). The sampled leaves were kept in between newspapers using the herbarium press and brought to the laboratory.…”
Section: Leaf Morphological Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%