2000
DOI: 10.1300/j137v03n01_01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Neighborhood and School Environments Perceptual and Aggregate Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have found that individuals' perceptions of neighborhood safety are determined by more than just specific experiences of violence. [33][34][35][36] For example women are more likely to perceive threats to their safety than men, with women over the age of 30 perceiving their neighborhood as less safe than younger women. 34 Additionally, mothers may report higher ratings of neighborhood safety to selfvalidate their decision to remain in a violent neighborhood, perhaps in part due to their inability to move to a new neighborhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have found that individuals' perceptions of neighborhood safety are determined by more than just specific experiences of violence. [33][34][35][36] For example women are more likely to perceive threats to their safety than men, with women over the age of 30 perceiving their neighborhood as less safe than younger women. 34 Additionally, mothers may report higher ratings of neighborhood safety to selfvalidate their decision to remain in a violent neighborhood, perhaps in part due to their inability to move to a new neighborhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This literature presents a complex relationship influenced by gender, race, age, education, feelings of vulnerability and helplessness, and neighborhood level factors. [33][34][35][36] However, this literature does not attempt to link measures of neighborhood violence with health outcomes.…”
Section: Measurement Of Neighborhood Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective measures are mainly collected in survey questionnaires by asking participants to report their own perceptions about their neighborhood environments (Diez Roux 2001). Evidence shows that both types of measurement are reliable and valid instruments for measuring neighborhood environments and their effects on health (Brownson et al 2009;Hadley-Ives et al 2000;Kamphius et al 2010;Kawachi and Berkman 2003;Jack and McCormack 2014;Poortinga, Dunstan, and Fone 2007;Schulz et al 2013;Wen, Hawkley, and Cacioppo 2006;Yen et al 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although the validity and unique contribution of measures of self-perception of surrounding environments are widely recognized (Hadley-Ives et al 2000;Kawachi and Berkman 2003), simultaneous applications of both objective and subjective measures of neighborhood environments, or some comprehensive index, would be preferable (Wen, Hawkley, and Cacioppo 2006;Schaefer-McDaniel et al 2010). Second, population density, an important factor associated with residents' health (Kim et al 2011;Mair, Diez Roux, and Galea 2008;McDonald, Forman, and Kareiva 2010), was not considered in our models due to unavailability of data.…”
Section: Limitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work of Crum and colleagues' (1996) measures of neighborhood disorganization included subjects' perceptions of areas to walk or play, safety outdoors, crime, racism or prejudice, litter, vandalism, publicly visible alcohol or drug use, abandoned buildings, poverty, church attendance, and sense of community. Other neighborhood characteristics that are indicators of neighborhood disorganization include: teenagers loitering, homeless persons, burglary, drug selling, robbery, and prostitution (Latkin and Curry, 2003;Hadley-Ives et al, 2000). Ennett and colleagues (1997) also included population density and high residential mobility, which are thought to erode social control and social integration within neighborhoods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%