Measuring of intellectual capital investments in higher education: case of Latvia

Abstract

Purpose Intellectual capital (IC) investments yield both financial and non-financial outcomes, and several groups of stakeholders are beneficiaries in the process. There are different approaches to appraisal of IC investments; most of them emphasise financial benefits. In turn, non-financial return is difficult to measure because of the lack of measurement indicators, as well as unavailability of accounting data and/or statistical data. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate non-financial return on investments in IC, based on the financial data of Latvian higher education institutions (HEI). Design/methodology/approach The methodology of Social Return on Investments (SROI) was applied. SROI metric is used to measure an expected return, considering the anticipated social benefits of an investment against its costs. The procedure is based on the principles of the “time value of money” concept and stakeholder management theory. Findings Non-financial outcomes (benefits) from investments into implementation of e-learning study process were defined, separately for each stakeholder group. Specific metrics for each outcome were determined, and the result was estimated (expressed in monetary form). Research limitations/implications There are different types of IC investments, but the authors of the given paper focussed on the digitalisation of study process, i.e. investments into the process of implementation and development of on-line studies were analysed. The proposed approach (SROI) is applied for measuring of IC investments, based on financial data of only one Latvian HEI. Originality/value SROI estimation for financial assessment of implemented innovations in Latvian higher education was made. This approach can help organisations to make decisions about IC investments, and the authors’ application of the methodology can be used as a pattern for HEI executives. This paper provides an example of the practical application of the methodology, using HEI real financial data.

Green Technology Innovation and High-Quality Economic Development: Spatial Spillover Effect

“…Vekic et al (2020) confi rmed that investment in green education allows achieving the region's sustainable development. In addition, Titko et al (2021) and Verina et al (2021) have proven that achieving green growth and spreading GTI require relevant digital transformation in the high education system. GTI could improve environmental quality and the masses' living environment and enhance residents' happiness and satisfaction.…”

Promoting Green Brand of University in Social Media: Text Mining and Sentiment Analysis

“…Therefore, considering the above statistical data and snowballing digitalization processes, the scientific community place greater focus on building the communication strategies and engaging the broader audience on the Internet, especially using the social media networks. Based on the above, designing the university's profile suitable for promotion through different digital channels increases the university's brand recognition (Kuzior et al, 2019;Titko et al, 2021;Verina et al, 2021). As a result, it could grab the attention of green transformation.…”

Analysis of the interval difference and spatial effects of Chinese green economic progress

“…Innovation and development are inseparable from the government's financial support, 2,3,[43][44][45] investment in research and development (R&D). Innovation-driven green economy high-quality development is reflected in knowledge in green development, [46][47][48] the use of new or improved technology, breaking through resource constraints, improving resource utilization, realizing the green transformation and transformation and upgrading of traditional industries, producing sanitary products, developing green industries and circular economy, effectively reduce the use of resources and pollution. Besides, it allows achieving sustainable environment-friendly development.…”