1999
DOI: 10.1080/096020199389437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Outcome: Development of an Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forty patients' outcome ratings on the HoNOS-ABI, Portland Adaptability Inventory (Lezac, 1987) and the Grafton Manor Study Hierarchy of Placements (Eames, 1999) following brain injury were compared. The Portland Adaptability Inventory is a clinician rated scale designed to determine psychosocial outcome following brain injury.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty patients' outcome ratings on the HoNOS-ABI, Portland Adaptability Inventory (Lezac, 1987) and the Grafton Manor Study Hierarchy of Placements (Eames, 1999) following brain injury were compared. The Portland Adaptability Inventory is a clinician rated scale designed to determine psychosocial outcome following brain injury.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggest classifying emotional reactions to specific life events using grief reactions as a model, and advocate the use of a short questionnaire (20-30 items) for rapid administration and minimal psychological distress. Eames (1999) reports a dearth of "real life," "end user" measures of outcome after severe brain injury which are distinct from measures of impairment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%