2005
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.036517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
152
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
152
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In about one in 500 screen positive children, both parents will be affected, but this has a minor effect on the detection rate in parents (reducing it by only about 0.2%). It has been estimated that the father is not the biological parent in about 4% of families, 14 so about 2% of men tested in this way would be misclassified as having the disorder when they did not. But this Expected impact of proposed screening strategy Figure 5 shows two flow diagrams to illustrate the effect of screening a population of 10 000 children attending for vaccination at 15 months of age, one without and one with the use of DNA diagnosis.…”
Section: Serum Cholesterol Measurement In Parentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In about one in 500 screen positive children, both parents will be affected, but this has a minor effect on the detection rate in parents (reducing it by only about 0.2%). It has been estimated that the father is not the biological parent in about 4% of families, 14 so about 2% of men tested in this way would be misclassified as having the disorder when they did not. But this Expected impact of proposed screening strategy Figure 5 shows two flow diagrams to illustrate the effect of screening a population of 10 000 children attending for vaccination at 15 months of age, one without and one with the use of DNA diagnosis.…”
Section: Serum Cholesterol Measurement In Parentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be pointed out that the effects of paternity uncertainty are not necessarily in contact with actual non paternity rates (cf. Gilding 2009) which have been estimated to between two and three percent in contemporary industrialized societies (Anderson 2006;Bellis et al 2005;Voracek et al 2008) but the important point is the potentiality of non paternity. It should also be pointed out that in general the evolutionary predispositions which might shape human's behaviour are not consciously intended motives for action but rather unconscious potentials which can be easily triggered out by the support of surrounding environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have shown that median EPP rates are only between 1 and 3% in most Western European populations [11,21,23], although rates can be higher in low socioeconomic settings [24] and in some traditional small-scale societies, such as among Yanomami Indians [25] and the Himba [9]. Recent relatively unbiased studies carried out on bone marrow transplantation samples obtained maximum-likelihood estimates of EPP rates of only 0.94% in a German population [26] and of 0.65% in a Swiss population [27]-figures that are probably representative for most Western European populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%