2019
DOI: 10.1177/0300060519868327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring patient activation in Chinese patients with hypertension and/or diabetes: reliability and validity of the PAM13

Abstract: Objective: Patient activation is important in the management of chronic diseases (CDs), especially hypertension and diabetes. The 13-item short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) is widely used, but data are lacking for China. The study aim was to assess the reliability and validity of the PAM13 in Chinese patients with hypertension and/or diabetes in a community management setting. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at four community health centres in Kunming (Yunnan province, China) Partici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PAM-13 validation studies were conducted also in a series of specific patient populations, including diabetes [37,84,85], metabolic syndrome [86], multiple sclerosis [87], neurological disorders [88,89], hypertension [37,85], cardiac conditions [90], schizophrenia [91], mental disorders [92], osteoarthritis [93][94][95], rheumatic diseases [37,96], HIV [97] or not specified chronic diseases [98][99][100], and clinical settings in different countries [101][102][103][104][105]. In some of these studies, convergent validity was assessed using generic and disease-specific measures of health-related attitudes or behaviours, such as self-efficacy [87,88,96,101], selfesteem [98], lifestyle [89] or health literacy [103,106].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAM-13 validation studies were conducted also in a series of specific patient populations, including diabetes [37,84,85], metabolic syndrome [86], multiple sclerosis [87], neurological disorders [88,89], hypertension [37,85], cardiac conditions [90], schizophrenia [91], mental disorders [92], osteoarthritis [93][94][95], rheumatic diseases [37,96], HIV [97] or not specified chronic diseases [98][99][100], and clinical settings in different countries [101][102][103][104][105]. In some of these studies, convergent validity was assessed using generic and disease-specific measures of health-related attitudes or behaviours, such as self-efficacy [87,88,96,101], selfesteem [98], lifestyle [89] or health literacy [103,106].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean patient activation score in the present study was 56.49 ± 15.12. The Chinese PAM-13 score for chronically ill patients was 60.1 ± 15.4 (Zeng et al, 2019). This difference could be explained by Zeng et al who examined patients with high blood pressure and/or type 2 diabetes in community health centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of some studies showed that the PAM13-P was similar to other versions of the PAM-13, including Italian (Cronbach's α = 0.88) (Graffigna et al, 2015), Dutch (Cronbach's α = 0.88) (Rademakers et al, 2012), Singaporean (Cronbach's α = 0.86) (Ngooi et al, 2017), Brazilian (Cronbach's α = 0.83) (Cunha et al, 2019), American (Cronbach's α = 0.81) (Prey et al, 2016), Turkish (Cronbach's α = 0.81) (Kosar & Besen, 2019), Malay (Cronbach's α = 0.79) (Bahrom et al, 2020) and German versions (Cronbach's α = 0.79) (Bomba et al, 2018). The Spanish (Cronbach's α = 0.93) (DeCamp et al, 2016) and Chinese versions of the PAM-13 (Cronbach's α = 0.92) (Zeng et al, 2019) had lower internal consistency than other versions. The item-total correlation coefficients for the PAM-13-P ranged from 0.46 to 0.63.…”
Section: Internal Consistency and Repeatabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher the score, the better the activation level. The Chinese version of the PAM-13 has shown good reliability and validity, with a Cronbach's α of 0.920 ( 28 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%