Measuring Patient-Centeredness of Care for Seriously Ill Individuals: Challenges and Opportunities for Accountability Initiatives

Abstract

Patient- and family-centeredness of care is particularly important for individuals with serious illness. In this article, we describe methodological challenges of using measures of patient- and family-centeredness in accountability initiatives such as public reporting and pay for performance. We begin with background on measuring patient- and family-centered care using standardized surveys, describe evidence of the use of these measures for quality improvement, and highlight methodological challenges in the development and implementation of these measures for use in accountability. To ensure that patient- and family-centeredness is the cornerstone of public and private accountability initiatives designed to promote high-quality care to seriously ill patients, we recommend development of (1) a nationally endorsed survey instrument that assesses patient and family experiences of serious illness care across the full range of patient trajectories and care settings in which this care is provided; (2) administrative data infrastructure that allows for identification and outreach to the most knowledgeable respondents for the survey, regardless of the patient's setting of care; and (3) a broad toolkit of quality improvement approaches to ensure that as the emphasis on accountability grows, providers across settings have access to tools that can help them improve patient- and family-centeredness of care for the seriously ill.

How representative are colorectal, lung, breast and prostate cancer patients responding to the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES) of the cancer registry population in England? A population-based case control study

“…An alternative is to expand the current sampling frame or move to continuous sampling throughout the year for patients with poor prognosis cancers. For example, the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems has made efforts and initiatives to capture unrepresented patients’ voices 29. Another example of a study including unrepresented patients is one carried in Denmark which aimed to capture lung cancer patient-reported outcomes at a nationwide level 21.…”

Health and Well-Being in the Year before Death: The Association with Quality of Life and Care at the End-of-Life

“…Future research may consider developing measures (e.g., that assess a degree, amount, or length of care at the EOL) that better depict the QOL and care quality. In fact, standardized measures exist for evaluating healthcare quality as experienced by the users, including the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Hospice Survey (Price & Elliott, 2018). That survey, which dates to 2015, assesses the experience of the hospice care users, including the patients and their caregivers, across multiple domains such as communication with family, getting timely help, training family to care for patients, and willingness to recommend hospice care to others (CAHPS Hospice Survey, n.d.).…”

Dying, death and bereavement: developing a national survey of bereaved relatives

“…Surveying people who are likely to die or who are actively dying poses significant challenges for numerous reasons, including the difficulty associated with predicting death [ 4 , 5 ] as well as the sensitivity and ethical issues related to burdening a person dying in participating in a survey [ 6 ]. Other matters that have precluded people’s ability to participate centre on the frailty of the individual or inability due to being in a semi-conscious state and deterioration in condition [ 7 – 9 ]. Instead, surveying bereaved relatives has been recommended to provide important insights and understanding of the experiences and quality of care delivered at end of life [ 10 – 12 ].…”