2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review

Abstract: BackgroundMatching demand and supply in nursing work continues to generate debate. Current approaches focus on objective measures, such as nurses per occupied bed or patient classification. However, staff numbers do not tell the whole staffing story. The subjective measure of nurses’ perceived adequacy of staffing (PAS) has the potential to enhance nurse staffing methods in a way that goes beyond traditional workload measurement or workforce planning methods.ObjectivesTo detect outcomes associated with nurses’… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(171 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our results contribute to the literature dealing with methods for determining staffing requirements (Griffiths et al, 2020 ), confirming that nurse‐to‐patient ratio is not a sufficiently accurate indicator for decision‐making with regards to staffing. A recent scoping review (van der Mark et al, 2021 ) reports that perceived adequacy of staffing by nurses could potentially be an available measure for staffing requirements. Our findings support this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our results contribute to the literature dealing with methods for determining staffing requirements (Griffiths et al, 2020 ), confirming that nurse‐to‐patient ratio is not a sufficiently accurate indicator for decision‐making with regards to staffing. A recent scoping review (van der Mark et al, 2021 ) reports that perceived adequacy of staffing by nurses could potentially be an available measure for staffing requirements. Our findings support this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, overstaffing reduced mortality even further, suggesting that these tools cannot identify optimum staffing. Nurses’ perceptions have been the gold standard measure of staffing adequacy;26 27 however, these measures are not completely reliable or valid 28. Most measures of perceived adequacy of staffing (PAS) are single items that directly ask for adequacy of staffing 28.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurses’ perceptions have been the gold standard measure of staffing adequacy;26 27 however, these measures are not completely reliable or valid 28. Most measures of perceived adequacy of staffing (PAS) are single items that directly ask for adequacy of staffing 28. These measures do not provide an underlying definition, which is insufficient for such a complex construct 29 30.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations