2015
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Performance in Psychiatry: A Call to Action

Abstract: Many recent public and private strategies aimed at improving the quality and efficiency of the U.S. health care system focus on measuring, reporting on, and providing incentives for improving quality. In behavioral health care, despite recent efforts, quality measurement for even the more common conditions is less well developed than for comparable general medical conditions. The absence of a comprehensive set of well-accepted measures capable of demonstrating the value of behavioral health treatment makes bui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a time when health care systems are increasingly focused on measuring, assessing, and providing incentives to improve quality (Glied et al, 2015; Patel et al, 2015), the lag in the development of behavioral health measures as compared to physical health measures is concerning (Institute of Medicine, 2006). Our findings of an association between three of our seven process measures and mortality provide support for the predictive validity of these measures and for their use as quality measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a time when health care systems are increasingly focused on measuring, assessing, and providing incentives to improve quality (Glied et al, 2015; Patel et al, 2015), the lag in the development of behavioral health measures as compared to physical health measures is concerning (Institute of Medicine, 2006). Our findings of an association between three of our seven process measures and mortality provide support for the predictive validity of these measures and for their use as quality measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important phenomenon to understand because racial bias in the identification of psychosis may generate disparities in psychiatric care, including delay in the application of effective treatments and exposure to adverse effects from incorrect treatments. In addition, there is a growing interest in psychiatry to develop objective rating scales to assess quality and efficiency of care [Glied et al, 2015], and understanding racial bias in assessment may help to develop more robust instruments. Moreover, racial bias may confound research with racially diverse samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creating a standard of care requires an understanding of how delivery models affect quality (9). To assess service needs and appropriately allocate resources, health services research is required to understand how duration and frequency of clinical encounters relate to outcomes and, crucially, how that relationship varies depending on diagnosis, acuity, comorbidities, psychosocial needs, and important clinician factors.…”
Section: Data From Aacp Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%