2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring personal heat exposure in an urban and rural environment

Abstract: Previous studies have linked heat waves to adverse health outcomes using ambient temperature as a proxy for estimating exposure. The goal of the present study was to test a method for determining personal heat exposure. An occupationally exposed group (urban groundskeepers in Birmingham, AL, USA N=21), as well as urban and rural community members from Birmingham, AL (N=30) or west central AL (N=30) wore data logging temperature and light monitors clipped to the shoe for 7 days during the summer of 2012. We fou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the large sample size allowed us to constrict the study period avoiding periods with higher rate of cardiovascular hospitalizations, such as Christmas [55], and thus avoiding violation of the SCCS assumption of constant events along time. Second, by using the self-controlled case series design, we automatically controlled for all time-fixed individual level factors that could be related to the association between outdoor temperature and human health, such as socioeconomic status [56] or body fat [26]. Third, we adjusted the models by air pollution which was previously reported as an inducing factor to develop cardiovascular diseases [57] or mortality [58], although we did not find an effect of pollution on cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the large sample size allowed us to constrict the study period avoiding periods with higher rate of cardiovascular hospitalizations, such as Christmas [55], and thus avoiding violation of the SCCS assumption of constant events along time. Second, by using the self-controlled case series design, we automatically controlled for all time-fixed individual level factors that could be related to the association between outdoor temperature and human health, such as socioeconomic status [56] or body fat [26]. Third, we adjusted the models by air pollution which was previously reported as an inducing factor to develop cardiovascular diseases [57] or mortality [58], although we did not find an effect of pollution on cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, distance between subjects’ home and the closest automatic weather station was in average 3.9 km (standard deviation, SD = 2.5 km). This estimate is commonly used in epidemiological studies when dealing with the effect of outdoor temperature on health [25], and it has been reported that ambient temperature recorded at the nearest weather station may be associated with personal heat exposure [26]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were unable to obtain indoor temperatures, but public interventions, such as heat warnings or advisories, are based on outdoor temperatures, and thus it is useful to know how they relate to mortality. Still, our study would benefit from efforts to gain more comprehensive data on temperature exposure that includes the indoor environment or the environment on an individual level 4446 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surveys did not formally measure individuals' heat exposure inside or outside the cooling centers or assess whether the geographical distribution or capacities of cooling centers were effectively reducing heat exposure across the region. To measure heat exposure objectively, participants could use personal sensors that capture experienced temperatures continuously (Bernhard et al 2015;Kuras et al 2015). Furthermore, a communitywide survey could reveal gaps in coverage and quantify the unmet need for reducing heat exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%