Measuring Political Legitimacy

Abstract

Political legitimacy is a key concept in both macro and micro theories. Pioneers in survey-based research on alienation and system support envisioned addressing macro questions about legitimacy with the sophisticated empiricism of individual-level methodology but failed; and a succession of innovations in item wording and questionnaire construction only led to an excessive concern with measurement issues at the individual level. I return to an enumeration of the informational requirements for assessing legitimacy in hopes of finding a conceptualization that better utilizes available survey indicators to tap relevant macro dimensions. I specify formal measurement models for both conventional and revised conceptualizations of legitimacy orientations and compare the fit of the two models systematically on data from the U.S. electorate. The revised model appears preferable on both theoretical and empirical grounds.

Why Doesn't Capitalism Flow to Poor Countries?

“…della Porta (2000) and Seligson (2002) discuss empirical evidence based on exposure to corruption. See also Dahl (1956), Huntington (1968), andWeatherford (1992). Political scientists have also studied how party identification moves over time in the US (see, for example, Jennings and Markus (1984)).…”

Obedience and Trust in the Brazilian Police from a Youth’s Perspective: The Preliminary Results

“…Democratic systems might need even more of it than non-democratic ones, because they are (usually) limited in using violence or coercion and they are bound to build cooperative relations with citizens. Earlier we saw that legitimacy shapes citizens' reactions to laws, polices and regulations (Weatherford, 1992). It was argued that people do not obey the law because they fear the sanctions, but because they put trust in it.…”

Isomorphic Diffusion in Public Sector: Focus on China

“…In terms of policy science, it seems that public organizations focus on legitimacy more than private institutions (Weatherford, 1992) because company performance can be easily measured by profits while the measurement of government performance is far more complex and cannot be evaluated by means of data and formulae alone. Some scholars used public interest as criteria, but these criteria itself could never be standardized, which signified uncertainty surrounding the position of public organizations and a higher risk of government innovation.…”