2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11558-022-09476-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring precision precisely: A dictionary-based measure of imprecision

Abstract: How can we measure and explain the precision of international organizations’ (IOs) founding treaties? We define precision by its negative – imprecision – as indeterminate language that intentionally leaves a wide margin of interpretation for actors after agreements enter into force. Compiling a “dictionary of imprecision” from almost 500 scholarly contributions and leveraging insight from linguists that a single vague word renders the whole sentence vague, we introduce a dictionary-based measure of imprecision… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… In comparative politics, Huber and Shipan (2002: 73) utilize the length of the legislative text as a proxy for control since “longer statutes on the same topic are more likely to tell agencies what to do, and shorter ones give them more leeway”. On a similar note, Citi and Jensen (2022) measure the levels of precision in legislative texts which limit the executive discretion of supranational authorities, while Gastinger and Schmidtke (2022) develop a dictionary‐based measure of imprecision as a proxy of discretion of international organizations. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… In comparative politics, Huber and Shipan (2002: 73) utilize the length of the legislative text as a proxy for control since “longer statutes on the same topic are more likely to tell agencies what to do, and shorter ones give them more leeway”. On a similar note, Citi and Jensen (2022) measure the levels of precision in legislative texts which limit the executive discretion of supranational authorities, while Gastinger and Schmidtke (2022) develop a dictionary‐based measure of imprecision as a proxy of discretion of international organizations. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 The theoretical literature sometimes treats contractual incompleteness as a continuous phenomenon but in the absence of prior measures, we opt for a binary operationalization. A recent example of measuring the precision of treaty substance in continuous terms is Gastinger and Schmidtke ( 2022 ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%