1997
DOI: 10.1177/0885713x9701200107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Quality of Care in a Psychiatric Hospital Using Artificial Neural Networks

Abstract: This study investigates a new method of measuring quality of care. Taking place at a tertiary psychiatric hospital with 5,128 admissions from January 1989 through December 1995, this study uses artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and uses the standard deviation of LOS in a formula to measure quality of care, Q. ANNs are trained with data using unique patient identifiers and are compared with identical ANNs trained without these identifiers. These two types of ANNs make a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the ever-expanding search to identify indicators of quality for health care in general (34), and of mental health services in particular (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), a fundamental question is raised: what will be the utility of indicators based on their purpose, acceptability, effectiveness, and impact? With the ever-expanding search to identify indicators of quality for health care in general (34), and of mental health services in particular (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), a fundamental question is raised: what will be the utility of indicators based on their purpose, acceptability, effectiveness, and impact?…”
Section: Scorecardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the ever-expanding search to identify indicators of quality for health care in general (34), and of mental health services in particular (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), a fundamental question is raised: what will be the utility of indicators based on their purpose, acceptability, effectiveness, and impact? With the ever-expanding search to identify indicators of quality for health care in general (34), and of mental health services in particular (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), a fundamental question is raised: what will be the utility of indicators based on their purpose, acceptability, effectiveness, and impact?…”
Section: Scorecardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring quality and its relationship to cost is slowly becoming a central issue in U.S. health care policy in general and in psychiatry in particular (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Value, a function of quality, cost, and patient satisfaction, must be measured to help payers and insured populations make informed choices and to assess the potential consequences of the choices that are avail-able (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have reported previously on measuring Q using ANNs (4). The essence of this work is relating a unique patient identifier (i.e., medical record number) to an important outcome indicator, hospital length-of-stay (LOS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%