2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring repetitive thinking in Iran: Psychometric properties of Persian version of Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaire produces a total score with higher scores representing greater levels of pathological worry (19). The Farsi version of the questionnaire has been used in several previous studies and proven to be a valid and reliable measure [Cronbach's alpha = 85; (20,21)]. Cronbach's alpha in the current sample was = 0.78.…”
Section: Penn State Worry Questionnairementioning
confidence: 81%
“…The questionnaire produces a total score with higher scores representing greater levels of pathological worry (19). The Farsi version of the questionnaire has been used in several previous studies and proven to be a valid and reliable measure [Cronbach's alpha = 85; (20,21)]. Cronbach's alpha in the current sample was = 0.78.…”
Section: Penn State Worry Questionnairementioning
confidence: 81%
“…The correlations between PTQ Total and subjective well-being, depression, and anxiety substantiated the validity of the scale. However, it was lower than in the first validation study using both clinical and nonclinical samples which showed no differences in the pattern of relationship between PTQ and anxiety/depression across sample type (Ehring et al, 2011) and in the general population study in Iran (Kami et al, 2019). However, these studies used self-report À2.9 (À3.5, À2.3) À1.9 (À2.9, À0.9)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The original validation study showed that the best factor structure of the PTQ was that of a second-order RNT factor and three first-order factors corresponding to the three features described before: (1) Core RNT Features, (2) Perceived Unproductiveness of RNT, and (3) RNT Capturing Mental Capacity (CFI = .950 -.980, RMSEA = .038 -.057; Ehring et al, 2011). This second-order structure was also replicated in Dutch-speaking undergraduates (Ehring et al, 2012), British patients with persecutory delusions (Cernis et al, 2016), Turkish non-clinical adults (Altan-Atalay & Saritas-Atalar, 2018), and Iranian clinical and non-clinical samples (Kami et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%